From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3B383A20F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:13:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 40B3B383A20F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id 76so12915335pfy.3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:13:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc; bh=xc+gXahK1osZ77cvXfofaxFeKaPUXWnEjQwlrPNbNeM=; b=cL+FjN9d5CBV959on4R5de6U6Qh5ejpmzColddYEoO5nhcPHC7zeL4FUl1tgDegFIw LTdpiGRySCEU+cJumZ3W1UMigBp39FrMV4gzDiGS7dT/d59hdETVMmYlLEKMMI9Wdwwf /uN1ZYxRKT7KSkavPSofFIpPVlRlQwk7cWPu24OFiqkZOeX6wxrhbp8xloKiGPDXFEYJ fa9N6t+EeHlFrrmlFDy3nTCPn9jjEq+RKPuWPfqoeKOFc2+mcp2x6ej4pFlepuxPspVv e0sOiX7XizandmUJgFMQ4P6UmHYbKcS7Jg++IsfwULLd1qYtwUslEdD4tMg5tJdKF5Bo qhhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=xc+gXahK1osZ77cvXfofaxFeKaPUXWnEjQwlrPNbNeM=; b=AgjegcyrXQwS/sLtf4tKBgydutSSvOAq360H10P2RH3SYbg6pioQC2Mk2eGcUiIi4L hPx+T9uZ9Alw2CrXNiCp+6JVPX29UMJbh86fn9i3XUbiLtsRh7iBB1bskZznaZEdnU2D U6/H9or/HpFtJFFdFefFn9oZucUppYdW6SuR/KSC7yJ8fSV76QKvNm/GIIPuFHRPu+A9 D9JEZD9izUFPVUys3YysPrap5awnem+S6Txcbs79GDXnt3/70YIU53hY3IjVDqR0EV/q tlugDw/wsgAqjt6yXToj25W1/TnpbU0EFl5gbNHy62WxXoXQgVPVLfAbGTBoptIcEwMZ Mkew== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2SwWq5gS8jWVQ228CuEtvV8girGoLFqMIQ8LkPac07c/zw98dj 31L9m/TX29rG38TeIhPq+EM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR62LS1A+hGztvqunBZF0nBIqwK3zbzbvt8HC3qOe4x68+wTajOcWQ9/gtGl8ikdAbHpSNpxUg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a63:0:b0:42f:e143:80d4 with SMTP id k35-20020a635a63000000b0042fe14380d4mr3388860pgm.456.1661904833898; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.0.204] (c-73-98-188-51.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [73.98.188.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n15-20020a170902e54f00b0016dbaf3ff2esm4777559plf.22.2022.08.30.17.13.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:13:51 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 32-bit PA-RISC with HP-UX: remove deprecated ports Content-Language: en-US To: John David Anglin , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <7181be4a-33bf-5092-0782-a951cdb63ee8@bell.net> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: <7181be4a-33bf-5092-0782-a951cdb63ee8@bell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 8/28/2022 10:34 AM, John David Anglin wrote: > On 2022-08-26 3:15 a.m., Martin Liška wrote: >> Removes the deprecated ports. If I'm correct all hpux9,hpux10 should >> be removed >> as they only provide 32-bit targets. On the contrary, hpux11 supports >> hppa64 that >> we still do support. > It is my understanding that the 32-bit hppa hpux targets were > deprecated because they don't > support ELF and the DWARF debug format (.stabs is to be removed). Some > of the changes to > libtool.m4 affect the 32-bit ia64 hpux target.  As far as I know, it > supports ELF and the DWARF > debug format. If someone really cared, they could support dwarf on the 32bit PA SOM targets -- but I'm not going to lose any sleep over 32bit PA SOM:-) > > Possibly, the removal of ia64-hpux should be considered but I think > it's a separate issue. Definitely separate.  I'd support at least deprecation if we haven't deprecated it already. jeff