From: Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.co.uk>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
gerald@pfeifer.com
Subject: Re: [Patch, gcc-wwdocs] Update to Fortran changes
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e55c0f82-6f22-f5ce-3145-af24bade6214@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29ee8006-a680-d621-ea95-899487267b0e@codethink.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2408 bytes --]
Second attempt this time with attachment.
Apologies.
regards,
Mark
On 26/11/2019 15:56, Mark Eggleston wrote:
>
> On 26/11/2019 11:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 11/26/19 11:46 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
>>> I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems
>>> related to my changes, however, it does object to the lack of
>>> character encoding in the file.
>>
>> Note that some script modifies the file a bit â the final file does
>> have a character encoding (content="text/html; charset=utf-8").
> Understood.
>>
>>> This is the first time in changing the wwwdoc, I haven't included a
>>> change log as there there doesn't appear to be any ChangeLog files.
>>
>> There is only a commit log (see 'git log'); the format is still a bit
>> in a flux as before there was only 'csv' where it applied to a single
>> file.
>>
>> [With git it is useful to have a meaningful single line (for "git log
>> --pretty=oneline") and, if needed, an empty line and something more.
>> As the main repository is going to move to GIT as well, this also
>> applies there. â But you already follow this style.]
>>
>>> The patch is attached. OK to commit?
>>
>> I wonder whether you should use a main bullet point with something
>> like "Legacy improvements (<code>-fdec</code>)" under which you put
>> the current list. [Or some other wording.] That makes it easier to
>> read for users â those, who care about legacy support, can quickly
>> look at the -fdec changes â while those interested in standard
>> Fortran can skip it. (Except for the character-diagnostic type-info
>> improvement, all are items seem to be for -fdec or -fdec-â¦)
> Used "Legacy extension:".
>>
>> In particular, currently, the following item does not make clear that
>> it is about legacy support: "Variables with the
>> <code>AUTOMATIC</code> attribute can be used in
>> <code>EQUIVALENCE</code> statements."
> Made it clear that this an extension of -fdec-static.
>>
>> I think it can remain as is with the -fdec umbrella item. But without
>> it really requires the background knowledge that the AUTOMATIC
>> attribute is only available with -fdec-static (or -fdec).
>
> Stated that -fdec-static or -fdec are needed to use AUTOMATIC in
> EQUIVALENCE.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>>
> Changes acceptable? OK to commit?
>
--
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Update-Fortran-changes.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2604 bytes --]
From f884924877ba84578e75bd16cb127bab33eb5ee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Eggleston <markeggleston@codethink.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:12:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update Fortran changes
---
htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
index 52eb303..a31e7e5 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html
@@ -206,6 +206,47 @@ a work-in-progress.</p>
with <code>-std=legacy</code>. <code>-Wargument-mismatch</code>
has been removed.
</li>
+ <li>
+ Legacy extensions:
+ <ul>
+ <li>
+ Default fields widths can be used for <code>I</code>, <code>F</code>
+ and <code>G</code> format specifiers when excplicit widths are omitted.
+ Use the option <code>-fdec-format-defaults</code>, this options is implied
+ with <code>-fdec</code>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ A blank format item at the end of a format specification i.e. nothing
+ following the final comma is allowed. Use the option
+ <code>-fdec-blank-format-item</code>, this options is implied with
+ <code>-fdec</code>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ The existing support for <code>AUTOMATIC</code> and <code>STATIC</code>
+ attributes has been extended to allow variables with the
+ <code>AUTOMATIC</code> attribute to be used in <code>EQUIVALENCE</code>
+ statements. Use <code>-fdec-static</code>, this option is implied by
+ <code>-fdec</code>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Allow character literals in assignments and <code>DATA</code> statements
+ for numeric (<code>INTEGER</code>, <code>REAL</code>, or
+ <code>COMPLEX</code>) or <code>LOGICAL</code> variables. Use the option
+ <code>-fdec-char-conversions</code>, this options is implied with
+ <code>-fdec</code>.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ DEC comparisons, i.e. allow Hollerith constants to be used in comparisons
+ with <code>INTEGER</code>, <code>REAL</code>, <code>COMPLEX</code> and
+ <code>CHARACTER</code> expressions. Use the option <code>-fdec</code>.
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ <li>
+ Character type names in errors and warnings now include <code>len</code>
+ in addition to <code>kind</code>, <code>*</code> is used for assumed
+ length. The kind is omitted if it the default kind. Examples:
+ <code>CHARACTER(12)</code>, <code>CHARACTER(6,4)</code>.
+ </li>
</ul>
<!-- <h3 id="go">Go</h3> -->
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-26 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-26 10:48 Mark Eggleston
2019-11-26 11:33 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-26 16:29 ` Mark Eggleston
2019-11-26 18:48 ` Mark Eggleston [this message]
2019-11-27 9:03 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-27 14:19 ` Mark Eggleston
2019-11-28 23:48 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2019-11-27 8:08 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-27 8:29 ` Tobias Burnus
2019-11-27 8:37 ` Janne Blomqvist
2019-11-27 17:34 ` Mark Eggleston
2019-11-28 20:12 ` Making things a bit easier (was: [Patch, gcc-wwdocs] Update to Fortran changes) Gerald Pfeifer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e55c0f82-6f22-f5ce-3145-af24bade6214@codethink.co.uk \
--to=mark.eggleston@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
--cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).