From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7B23857371 for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 10:06:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BF7B23857371 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A86F33E54; Mon, 16 May 2022 06:06:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from naga.home (188-23-165-27.adsl.highway.telekom.at [188.23.165.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8D5E33E53; Mon, 16 May 2022 06:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:06:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Tobias Burnus cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [wwwdocs][Patch] Add OpenMP by-GCC-version implementation status In-Reply-To: <798bc8e6-567b-5ed6-e298-655948e89f5e@mentor.com> Message-ID: References: <798bc8e6-567b-5ed6-e298-655948e89f5e@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:06:26 -0000 Hi Tobias, On Sat, 14 May 2022, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Jakub and I discussed the other day that it would be useful > to have a page similar to > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html > to provide by-GCC-version information of the which OpenMP are supported. this looks like a great idea, thanks! > Comments regarding the file, where it is placed and how it is linked to? > I found it simpler to have a single very long line rather than trying > to break it into 80-character lines, but I can also do this reformatting. Yes, in cases like this with a small and fixed set of contributors (to that table) ... whatever serves you best. Regarding the name projects/gomp/openmp-status.html feels a bit long? How about projects/gomp/status.html ? Or maybe even make this part of the main index.html page, so projects/gomp/ in the browser? The former is more of a stronger recommendation, the latter just a thought. Minor tweak: it's "to file a bug report", so "filing a bug" not "filling a bug", though indeed when filing a bug report one needs to fill a form. :-) Gerald