public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Robin Dapp <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, kito.cheng@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Enable vec_int testsuite for RVV VLA vectorization
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:49:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5fc8f8c-aad0-4ad7-c044-6af5b4b17cc5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07474492-1fa9-db00-5b3f-0cd9b63e6c34@gmail.com>



On 8/28/23 08:27, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> LGTM from my side, but I would like to wait Robin is ok too
> 
> In principle I'm OK with it as well, realizing we will still need to fine-tune
> a lot here anyway.  For now, IMHO it's good to have some additional test coverage
> in the vector space but we should not expect every test to be correct/a good match
> for everything we do yet.  Juzhe mentioned he doesn't want to commit this before
> all/most bugs are addresses anyway, right?
No strong opinions on my side.  We could enable now knowing there's 
failures and that list of failures becomes a TODO list.  Or we could 
wait for more to be working before committing to keep our test results 
reasonably clean.

I could make an argument for either direction, but since Juzhe & Robin 
are doing most of the autovec work, happy to go with whatever they prefer.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-28 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-28 11:42 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-08-28 14:18 ` Kito Cheng
2023-08-28 14:27   ` Robin Dapp
2023-08-28 18:49     ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-08-29  0:40     ` juzhe.zhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5fc8f8c-aad0-4ad7-c044-6af5b4b17cc5@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).