From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C028F3858415 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:57:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C028F3858415 Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id d11so13399421qtw.3 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=zgOQusJZd5sD8lN4ciLbelEUZfXZWAOhCIfvRXIHCC0=; b=EgJz6IDAyR/PNg5nFxy8hdhjN88SVDjjddyB6zIPKqQGAbDpB8Z0M0CrVtJ3/eYH/y gIPkaKjwDNoX80sDEtE6FLV9t2JnCo/tB2Q/Snfvng1nw/3/G0mgeyoZujrF6BTqfR+y SyXx54SC6ebpYprNaf3ho/X6he3YdUtw6fzrxqHraeGc95soOKR9svt77qTY/iSSX/kf 6d4kdfJhQj3thQyNFMlnxvqMxlRp1jS2tlfFa1sHhtAwH26qCEpnJI7xlU7bRYS2dTTf 2v4gfMiNVmmKpkh0s9nYGtbXlXVoYjAFachBnECix8nHlsJThz8QDYjIVGsMr7bFUBvq 1qRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UdGjIlZrDnb6QJb7fBb+sa+Et3Q41dhj21WtApyUpmFShHJsb vcZBsEfjDuwjElZd4tZ3XdQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpPqtwBnMMr2Wda62YQkqMbQcVNfDKVYoIKMDW+I1r3AZNR3M1DYuD4R4Hjl3detAppAoOVQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5c54:: with SMTP id j20mr2787475qtj.4.1632070672384; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.0.175] (c-98-202-48-222.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [98.202.48.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d78sm9356696qkg.92.2021.09.19.09.57.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Patch][doc][PR101843]clarification on building gcc and binutils together To: Qing Zhao Cc: Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches , John Henning References: <72d8eff5-5a0f-9e4d-68be-476c4bc1fc5c@gmail.com> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 10:57:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:57:53 -0000 On 9/9/2021 9:05 AM, Qing Zhao wrote: > Hi, Jeff, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > The following is the reply from John Henning and the updated patch based on your suggestions, > Please take a look and let us know any issue there. I would strongly recommend removing all the documentation related to single tree builds.  While they were quite useful in the past, setting up such a tree these days is error prone and discouraged. Jeff