From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81967 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2017 16:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81855 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jun 2017 16:54:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*law X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:54:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C00637E66; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:54:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1C00637E66 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=law@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1C00637E66 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BF45C3FB; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle bzero/bcopy in DSE and aliasing (PR 80933, 80934) To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener , Martin Sebor References: From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 On 06/04/2017 09:36 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 2 June 2017 13:12:41 CEST, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Note I'd be _much_ more sympathetic to simply canonicalizing all of >> bzero and bcopy >> to memset / memmove and be done with all the above complexity. > > Indeed and even more so since SUSv3 marked it LEGACY and both were removed in SUSv4. > thanks, Likewise. jeff