From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264BF3858D20 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:23:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 264BF3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 264BF3858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712478240; cv=none; b=F5J8DCxDOrq/iFIcyt8Z2sDZov0vviuW+B9BF/1W9cnoAZTS2pmP5ZKH7YEX7Cj/bOG5y9Kxm9a1D6MdLIJer9e0Mr0eZAijT8ot6IGVCBFeCokenn/aCZqGKKfdQEHyP8gvdyFIT843JwCWMqZmW6sZCXfiVFNU5NXcPaRpk6Y= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712478240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jrka5/zCQh8MWuTf4XYZa82wyOB9YxF6SuUqc2u6D90=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=Q3GIOXNd/ejPrqwbjkn5R9B1ETs14s4i643Lr3i44Ah4S5F8GoukkrWwv3dWY2G11NUdp0WGsyGOfIuJAgKXJOfaIb+ySchiE1sx0x3hIkw1Y9mVsDkWZAXu2SpZLCxt7vyR2xNjcheCqnib71LVtzN0Zs4KyZhXEN8B2+xXbFs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1712478235; bh=jrka5/zCQh8MWuTf4XYZa82wyOB9YxF6SuUqc2u6D90=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q+W3+ov9VGpg2rapx1Mwsg+XsqZY43FE0efkgFUfIyVgyi/uKctKVEDEY56RMPku+ C078a6nCLJWk4EvtoDKkhj5kEIYU0tuMGTPByKyZ3zweesG8YZhlWYcdxxx70OYduo UgPJr6LG7QZiDEezUtvbNQ+d+FXicCz+1TzcUPUQ= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CFAF668F7; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 04:23:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Enable switchable target From: Xi Ruoyao To: Yang Yujie , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: chenglulu@loongson.cn, xuchenghua@loongson.cn Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 16:23:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20240407074743.2747877-2-yangyujie@loongson.cn> References: <20240407074743.2747877-2-yangyujie@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 15:47 +0800, Yang Yujie wrote: > This patch fixes the back-end context switching in cases where functions > should be built with their own target contexts instead of the > global one, such as LTO linking and functions with target attributes (TBD= ). >=20 > PR target/113233 Oops, so this PR isn't fixed with r14-7134 "LoongArch: Implement option save/restore"? Should I reopen it? --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University