From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107166 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2016 20:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107155 invoked by uid 89); 11 Sep 2016 20:53:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:53:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u8BKrH2F022192 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:18 -0400 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 25cb2gvnrv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:17 -0400 Received: from d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.168) by e18.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.205) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:14 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: bergner@vnet.ibm.com Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049EDC90042; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav03.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u8BKrDnf12386638; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:53:13 GMT Received: from b01ledav03.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E790B204E; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otta.local (unknown [9.80.214.126]) by b01ledav03.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CA4B204D; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 16:53:12 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH, LRA] Fix PR rtl-optimization 77289, LRA matching constraint problem To: Bernd Edlinger References: Cc: Andrew Pinski , GCC Patches , Jeff Law , Vladimir Makarov , Bill Schmidt From: Peter Bergner Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16091120-0044-0000-0000-000001287346 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00005747; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000185; SDB=6.00756591; UDB=6.00358561; IPR=6.00529800; BA=6.00004707; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00012639; XFM=3.00000011; UTC=2016-09-11 20:53:15 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16091120-0045-0000-0000-00000540757F Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-09-11_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609020000 definitions=main-1609110329 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 On 9/11/16 3:35 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > FYI: I have a patch for the aarch64 regression here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39600 > > It passes bootstrap and reg-testing on x86_64-linux-gnu. Thanks for debugging and fixing this! > Also the mentioned aarch64 and powerpc test cases > pass manually in a cross-compiler, but I cannot do the > boot-strap on powerpc or aarch64 by myself. > > So It would be nice if one of you would take the time > and try that patch. I can confirm that is bootstraps and regtests with no regressions on powerpc64le-linux and that the pr77289.c test case does pass. Peter