From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC2C3858D33; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0BC2C3858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3238UwZi029073; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:48 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=GvgHjYWSE7yAaBWTJptOS0L53dZm13Z6isWKFFnJ4hM=; b=RrsCu61Q+n/+btYeq9FYgu9OCErrYNnp6M6mIVZ3LvtX3B7lXt6OFHI/febhdUOOXfHs I8caWGCeShUdgTcC57C+rD+hcAUfQ4R9LrRDM+HPKGNdboF6pc0aLkKH1G0FGZbKdWOt kDupDlZRSSOHdtq4QdUvaOkTw9ktFt9Vr3dFg60KYv9gOG0tz++v7hh8ayQ18IRXPynm REsff/BhOM1eXXPOf3QwCHuQwZeXDCAZqWtzAsu6TFDs4q74dEyz7GOPIgLPUoX47acC 7jTNIiumFaRWqRjd2mFk8TmTthh7Rmx1/5pZ8xtNHr4GF+aFMEFG2NGd+Of4LzSecB75 Ig== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3p3deyt7ry-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:56:48 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3239ukUR009421; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:48 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3p3deyt7rf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:56:48 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3232sQNS015515; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:46 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nybdfw6y3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:56:46 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3239ug4A25755952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:42 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D0020040; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E914520049; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.241.247] (unknown [9.197.241.247]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:56:39 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:56:39 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2, gfortran] Escalate failure when Hollerith constant to real conversion fails [PR103628] Content-Language: en-US To: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches , fortran Cc: Segher Boessenkool , David , "Kewen.Lin" , Peter Bergner References: <5049d46a-5edb-42c1-798a-b21410f6bdc0@codesourcery.com> From: HAO CHEN GUI In-Reply-To: <5049d46a-5edb-42c1-798a-b21410f6bdc0@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZGeurPqtmdvy79ucQTyJGS6WHVeWZJzz X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 89mOfociQGxL0VOBXTE5ojY48ocvjSNq Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-03_01,2023-03-02_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2303030084 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Tobias, 在 2023/3/3 17:29, Tobias Burnus 写道: > But could you also include the 'gcc/fortran/intrinsic.cc' change > proposed in > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613030.html (and > acknowledged by Steve)? Sure, I will merge it into the patch and do the regression test. Additionally, Kewen suggested: >> Since this test case is powerpc only, I think it can be moved to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran. > > Which sounds reasonable. Test cases under gcc.target are tested by check-gcc-c. It greps "warning" and "error" (C style, lower case) from the output while check-gcc-fortran greps "Warning" and "Error" (upper case). As the test case needs to check the "Warning" and "Error" messages. I have to put it in gfortran.dg directory. What's your opinion? Gui Haochen Thanks