From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394D73858D33 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 22:42:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 394D73858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7555A33E56; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 17:42:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from naga.localdomain (62-47-241-209.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.241.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C704033E9F; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 17:42:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 23:42:25 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "H.J. Lu" cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener Subject: Re: [PATCH] INSTALL: Default to --enable-cet=auto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20201127134211.1808714-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, H.J. Lu wrote: > The new wording is > > --- > @code{--enable-cet=auto} is default. CET is enabled on Linux/x86 if > target binutils supports @code{Intel CET} instructions and disabled > otherwise. In this case, the target libraries are configured to get > additional @option{-fcf-protection} option. > --- > > On Linux/x86, if binutils supports CET, target libraries will be compiled > with -fcf-protection}. I'm afraid this (the last sentence) is not really clear reading what is in install.texi. Maybe instead of "In this case, the target libraries are configured to get additional @option{-fcf-protection} option." something like "In the former case the target libraries are additionally configured with @option{-fcf-protection}." ? Gerald