public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:57:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea89fce3-b197-8f9a-0d93-945921febfba@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc0UhYU_qSBcF8t9iVbxDqe4qTEWepxVCMwfvp+p8D2QEw@mail.gmail.com>

on 2021/7/19 下午10:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:20 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch follows Martin's suggestion here[1], to support
>> range-based for loops for traversing loops, analogously to
>> the patch for vec[2].
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9,
>> x86_64-redhat-linux and aarch64-linux-gnu, also
>> bootstrapped on ppc64le P9 with bootstrap-O3 config.
>>
>> Any comments are appreciated.
> 
> Since you are touching all FOR_EACH_LOOP please
> make implicit 'cfun' uses explicit.  I'm not sure ALL_LOOPS
> should scream, I think all_loops (function *, flags) would be
> nicer.
> 
> Note I'm anticipating iteration over a subset of the loop tree
> which would ask for specifying the 'root' of the loop tree to
> iterate over so it could be
> 
>   loops_list (class loop *root, unsigned flags)
> 
> and the "all" cases use loops_list (loops_for_fn (cfun), flags) then.
> Providing an overload with struct function is of course OK.
> 

Thanks for the comments, Richi.  Will update them in V2. 
I noticed the current loop_iterator requires a struct loops*
for LI_ONLY_INNERMOST, if you don't mind, I will use

  loops_list (class loops *loops, unsigned flags)

instead to make LI_ONLY_INNERMOST happy.  Your mentioned root can
be just the tree_root of the input loops.

BR,
Kewen



  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-20  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19  6:20 Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19  6:26 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-07-20  8:56   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 14:08 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20  8:56   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 14:34 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20  8:57   ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2021-07-19 15:59 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-20  8:58   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-20  9:49     ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20  9:50       ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20 14:42       ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Kewen.Lin
2021-07-22 12:56   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-22 12:56     ` Richard Biener
2021-07-23  8:41     ` [PATCH] Make loops_list support an optional loop_p root Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23 16:26       ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-27  2:25         ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-29  8:01       ` Richard Biener
2021-07-30  5:20         ` [PATCH v2] " Kewen.Lin
2021-08-03 12:08           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-04  2:36             ` [PATCH v3] " Kewen.Lin
2021-08-04 10:01               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-04 10:47                 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-08-04 12:04                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-05  8:50                     ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23  8:35   ` [PATCH v3] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23 16:10     ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-27  2:10       ` [PATCH v4] " Kewen.Lin
2021-07-29  7:48         ` Richard Biener
2021-07-30  7:18         ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-07-30  7:58           ` Kewen.Lin
2021-11-24 14:24             ` Reduce scope of a few 'class loop *loop' variables (was: [PATCH v4] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops) Thomas Schwinge
2021-11-24 16:58               ` Martin Jambor
2021-11-24 19:44               ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea89fce3-b197-8f9a-0d93-945921febfba@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).