From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6111383F877 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:43:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A6111383F877 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-400-Iq21NuN2NjW31Enum_CfcQ-1; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 15:43:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Iq21NuN2NjW31Enum_CfcQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7B8100945D; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-114-158.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-114-158.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.114.158]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6131F5D9E5; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable CET in cross compiler if possible From: Jeff Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: GCC Patches Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:43:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <20200508131105.170077-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <41f06d335fe33d310c74e7f55afe96bc7db74812.camel@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2 (3.36.2-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:43:21 -0000 On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 08:18 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 06:11 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Don't perform CET run-time check for host when cross compiling. Instead, > > > enable CET in cross compiler if possible so that it will run on both CET > > > and non-CET hosts. > > > > > > config/ > > > > > > PR bootstrap/94998 > > > * cet.m4 (GCC_CET_HOST_FLAGS): Enable CET in cross compiler if > > > possible. > > > > > > libiberty/ > > > > > > PR bootstrap/94998 > > > * configure: Regenerated. > > > > > > lto-plugin/ > > > > > > PR bootstrap/94998 > > > * configure: Regenerated. > > OK > > jeff > > OK for backport to GCC 10? ISTM it doesn't meet the general criteria for backports, specifically it doesn't fix a regression. ISTM that the release managers would need to ACK for a backport. jeff