public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: bonzini@gnu.org, neroden@gcc.gnu.org,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	aoliva@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: arrange to use appropriate objcopy
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:13:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb7bde90-ef11-3186-8fd5-76ffb8b9c947@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp8BKQF0fLiN6+C9@tucnak>

On 07.06.2022 09:41, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:12:26AM +0200, Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> This regressed
>>> Executing on host: /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/xgcc -B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/     -fdiagnostics-plain-output   -flto -g -gsplit-dwarf   -c -o c_lto_pr83719_0.o /home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr83719_0.c    (timeout = 300)
>>> spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/xgcc -B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/ -fdiagnostics-plain-output -flto -g -gsplit-dwarf -c -o c_lto_pr83719_0.o /home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr83719_0.c
>>> cc1: note: '-gsplit-dwarf' is not supported with LTO, disabling
>>> /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj44/gcc/objcopy: line 120: exec: --: invalid option
>>> exec: usage: exec [-cl] [-a name] [command [argument ...]] [redirection ...]
>>> compiler exited with status 1
>>> FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr83719 c_lto_pr83719_0.o assemble,  -flto -g -gsplit-dwarf 
>>> for me, both on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
>>
>> Hmm, it surely worked for me for both, with and without in-tree binutils
>> (you don't say which variant you saw the failure with).
> 
> System binutils.
> grep ORIGINAL_ gcc/Makefile 
> ORIGINAL_AS_FOR_TARGET = /usr/bin/as
> ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_TARGET = /usr/bin/ld
> ORIGINAL_NM_FOR_TARGET = /usr/bin/nm
> ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET = 
> ls -l /usr/bin/{as,ld,nm,objcopy}
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 439192 Mar 10 12:51 /usr/bin/as
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root     20 May 20 13:28 /usr/bin/ld -> /etc/alternatives/ld
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  47928 Mar 10 12:51 /usr/bin/nm
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 184304 Mar 10 12:51 /usr/bin/objcopy
> (but ditto grep ORIGINAL_ stage1-gcc/Makefile
> or grep ORIGINAL_ prev-gcc/Makefile).
> 
>>> For some reason, I have
>>> grep OBJCOPY *gcc/Makefile
>>> gcc/Makefile:ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET = 
>>> prev-gcc/Makefile:ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET = 
>>> stage1-gcc/Makefile:ORIGINAL_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET = 
>>
>> What about the corresponding ORIGINAL_NM_FOR_TARGET? And could you provide
>> one of the config.log instances? 
> 
> config.log has:
> configure:23317: checking what linker to use
> configure:23351: result: /usr/bin/ld
> configure:23379: checking for nm
> configure:23397: found /usr/bin/nm
> configure:23409: result: /usr/bin/nm
> configure:23420: checking what nm to use
> configure:23428: result: /usr/bin/nm
> configure:23498: checking what objcopy to use
> configure:23506: result:
> configure:23536: checking for objdump
> configure:23554: found /usr/bin/objdump
> configure:23566: result: /usr/bin/objdump
> configure:23577: checking what objdump to use
> configure:23587: result: /usr/bin/objdump
> 
> It is a bootstrapped compiler:
> ../configure --enable-languages=default,obj-c++,lto,go,d --enable-checking=yes,rtl,extra --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes && make -j32 bootstrap > LOG 2>&1
> on Fedora 36 x86_64-linux (ada left out because it is currently broken).
> 
> Comparing the toplevel Makefile, I see some differences:
> grep NM_FOR_TARGET Makefile 
> 	NM_FOR_TARGET="$(NM_FOR_TARGET)"; export NM_FOR_TARGET; \
> 	NM="$(COMPILER_NM_FOR_TARGET)"; export NM; \
> NM_FOR_TARGET=$(NM)
> COMPILER_NM_FOR_TARGET=$$r/$(HOST_SUBDIR)/gcc/nm
> 	"NM_FOR_TARGET=$(NM_FOR_TARGET)" \
> 	'NM=$(COMPILER_NM_FOR_TARGET)' \
> grep OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET Makefile 
> 	OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET="$(OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET)"; export OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET; \
> 	OBJCOPY="$(OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET)"; export OBJCOPY; \
> OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET=$(OBJCOPY)
> 	"OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET=$(OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET)" \
> 	'OBJCOPY=$$(OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET)' \
> E.g. the COMPILER_*_FOR_TARGET line is missing completely for OBJCOPY
> and the last line is different too.
> Also:
> grep ^NM[[:space:]]*= Makefile; echo end
> NM = nm
> end
> grep ^OBJCOPY[[:space:]]*= Makefile; echo end
> end
> 
> Note, I see
> S["OBJDUMP"]="objdump"
> S["OBJCOPY"]="objcopy"
> S["WINDMC"]="windmc"
> S["WINDRES"]="windres"
> S["STRIP"]="strip"
> S["RANLIB"]="ranlib"
> S["NM"]="nm"
> in toplevel status, it is just that toplevel:
> grep ^NM Makefile.tpl 
> NM_FOR_BUILD = @NM_FOR_BUILD@
> NM = @NM@
> NM_FOR_TARGET=@NM_FOR_TARGET@
> grep ^OBJCOPY Makefile.tpl 
> OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET=@OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET@
> doesn't have the OBJCOPY = @OBJCOPY@ line, and perhaps the
> COMPILER_OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET stuff.

Let me revert the change - I've just realized that I only thought I would
have tested this with system binutils as well. I'm sorry for the breakage.

Jan


      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-02 15:32 Jan Beulich
2022-06-03  6:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-04  8:32 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-07  6:12   ` Jan Beulich
2022-06-07  7:41     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-07  8:13       ` Jan Beulich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb7bde90-ef11-3186-8fd5-76ffb8b9c947@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=aoliva@gnu.org \
    --cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=neroden@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).