From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5D93858C50 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AB5D93858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32HN1lnJ002096; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : from : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=8H9bV8rbthqWrHScQ3Ia/LBKwPLgrCDV7uFYX8Z0AlM=; b=Q6CtDQgulmJuQUQxd4aU1ycFhGLbtJbyxgEDbM7jMlFeVcRDpcXEtotmo0CpBiUS4l/k NNt+FluPlxy6ybQs8E8f483BG65BUBUDmmftyjIP7CMBtCsKXecN+/c5KlCqkLE1DqWl 1k4i0rStyro7ol2xFSpCsnLKxeUVygIcmNeiY5r/2NweBShWpFQ8sjZ3Sor1VeeDfehY fSRL6h1z4EiS+VPAvDo5m0T/ZprC4fOp7g8lOFZENyQd7uOJqpmFQDj237gZhej/R0nB V6+GlNEwfFMj/+BzRP/rrhAHm24LrqnU5IHHdZN2jx/i70ugHsBNenEEdWCkFtCWfwDj kw== Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pd1h6h6w5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:34 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32I0Bnp3000650; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:33 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.129.113]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pbs7yx3xk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:33 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.101]) by smtprelay03.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 32I0HUsM23331370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:30 GMT Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256385805A; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DF358051; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.211.90.110] (unknown [9.211.90.110]) by smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 00:17:29 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 19:17:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't ICE when compiling the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in [PR109178] Content-Language: en-US From: Peter Bergner To: GCC Patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool , "Kewen.Lin" , Chip Kerchner References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JvN_dDbRwsoB32kbv-egiMrMOWGuHBm2 X-Proofpoint-GUID: JvN_dDbRwsoB32kbv-egiMrMOWGuHBm2 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-17_20,2023-03-16_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=625 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303150002 definitions=main-2303170174 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/17/23 5:35 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode > for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution > is to use the correct TMODE mode. > > Is this ok for trunk and gcc12 assuming my bootstraps and regtests show > no regressions? The trunk bootstrap and regtests were clean. I'm still waiting on the backport testing to finish. Peter