From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mliska@suse.cz>
Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26333851C18
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:41:10 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E26333851C18
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mliska@suse.cz
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27])
 by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137C7ACB7;
 Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cygwin/MinGW: Do not version lto plugins
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: JonY <10walls@gmail.com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <82361830-475f-85ab-11bb-c4d8a595754b@gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc1hAenw+Sdr=dDNpO_yZVyPSoNpPAimao=zX61V-reQ6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <4771abc3-6274-e582-c6b0-0c5166e44b17@gmail.com>
 <a852cce4-fc6a-3d27-e4d2-df7b8be559a5@gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc0xsUBmA_gH5H5YB3ksaCbda=P+Kd6=ZSXU7Z-RtEBKzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <853d52ec-40dd-8b98-e323-61d6179f6c4d@gmail.com>
 <c2b236bd-cf9e-04de-b224-e6ee1cf09995@suse.cz>
 <CAFiYyc2Q09roveqqiCT2gfhXGHTVa0Ep7e9hFjRz_WEPtmx7oQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <ee836ffe-75b3-2883-4644-c92cbfe5f227@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:41:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2Q09roveqqiCT2gfhXGHTVa0Ep7e9hFjRz_WEPtmx7oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:41:11 -0000

On 9/21/20 1:37 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Isn't that eventually just because the 'gcc' package looks for
> liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0 instead of liblto_plugin.so?

Yes.

Martin