From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6C13858D1E for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:29:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1A6C13858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C5433E60; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:29:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.30.2.25] (unknown [195.53.52.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B45733E6F; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:29:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 08:29:16 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Alexander Monakov , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: remove documentation for unsupported releases In-Reply-To: <2b92b94f-1593-daa5-9f9c-ece4af2be922@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <70755dd7-6b64-d24b-560d-b5433c9cc344@suse.cz> <4281e5af-ac34-1f2e-e1a4-b017423637e6@ispras.ru> <2b92b94f-1593-daa5-9f9c-ece4af2be922@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-661692388-1668065359=:6261" X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-661692388-1668065359=:6261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Alexander Monakov wrote: > For this I would suggest using the
tag to neatly fold links > for old releases. Please see the attached patch. Loving it, Alexander! What do you guys think about unfolding all releases we, the GCC project, currently support (per https://gcc.gnu.org that'd be 12.x, 11.x, and 10.x at this point)? Either way: yes, please (aka approved). :-) On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Martin Li¨ka wrote: > I do support the patch. It should help with the Google indexing (maybe). And thank you for raising this, Martin! Gerald --8323328-661692388-1668065359=:6261--