Re: [committed] Remove compromised sh test

[Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de>]

On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 16:39 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> 
> On 6/26/24 4:12 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 07:22 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > Surya's recent patch to IRA improves the code for sh/pr54602-1.c
> > > slightly.  Specifically it's able to eliminate a save/restore in the
> > > prologue/epilogue and a bit of register shuffling.
> > > 
> > > As a result there literally aren't any insns that can be used to fill
> > > the delay slot of the return, so a nop gets emitted and the test fails.
> > > 
> > > Given there literally aren't any insns to move into the delay slot, the
> > > best course of action is to just drop the test.
> > > 
> > > Pushed to the trunk.
> > > 
> > > Jeff
> > 
> > I can't reproduce what you are saying.
> > Which triplet and flags is your test setup using?
> > 
> > For this test case, GCC 13 with -m4 -ml -O1 -fno-pic:
> No -m flags at all.   As plain of a testrun as you can do.
> 

OK, then what's the default config of your test setup / triplet?
Can you please show the generated code that you get?  Because - like I said
- I can't reproduce it.

Best regards,
Oleg Endo