From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Introduce configure flag --with-stage1-cflags.
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2a4a836-fad3-c3ec-02f9-03c71107fa9d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3c3fe8c-b8c6-ea19-df59-f2613dbf92e6@suse.cz>
PING^1
Richi are you fine with the suggested change? I basically followed your advises :)
Martin
On 05/26/2017 03:00 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 01:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:46:47PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> After a discussion with Richi, using adding "-O2" to STAGE1 cflags with a recent
>>>>> enough compiler can significantly speed up bootstrap. Thus I'm suggesting to
>>>>> introduce --with-stage1-cflags where one can provide such options.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this is necessary -- you can always override with STAGE1_CFLAGS.
>>>>
>>>>> Apart from that, maybe it would be handy to automatically enable "-O2" when
>>>>> one has a recent compiler? Do we have an example where we detect host compiler
>>>>> and it's version?
>>>>
>>>> Don't know about version but configury already detects that we use GCC, so that
>>>> knowledge should be readily available.
>>>
>>> Well, it certainly shouldn't be -O2 by default for any system GCC, more
>>> something like if it is major of the configured configure minus 1 or newer
>>> (or minus 2?), then use -O2, otherwise default to -O0 as before.
>>
>> I'd still default to -O0 on release branches regardless of version and then
>> for development we can probably simply use "any GCC" when people have
>> the chance to override.
>
> Ok, sending new patch that does that on experimental branches for ${CC} --version
> being a GCC newer than 4.9.
>
> Martin
>
>>
>> At least for me host GCC 4.8 works quite well with -O2.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Jakub
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-25 9:26 Martin Liška
2017-05-26 11:47 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-26 11:55 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-05-26 11:59 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-26 13:02 ` Martin Liška
2017-05-26 13:19 ` Martin Liška
2017-06-19 10:51 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2017-06-19 12:30 ` Richard Biener
2017-07-31 7:48 ` Martin Liška
2017-08-25 20:49 ` Jeff Law
2017-08-28 12:55 ` Richard Biener
2017-08-30 12:19 ` Martin Liška
2017-05-29 11:35 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-05-30 7:00 ` Richard Biener
2017-05-30 10:30 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-05-30 10:33 ` Martin Liška
2017-05-30 11:12 ` Eric Botcazou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2a4a836-fad3-c3ec-02f9-03c71107fa9d@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).