From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57615 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2019 21:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57606 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2019 21:27:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:AM6PR08, H*i:sk:AM6PR08, H*f:sk:668a31e X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 21:27:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06CBC3060815; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-68.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A49C60470; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8 To: Delia Burduv , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Cc: nd , "ian@airs.com" , "rguenther@suse.de" References: <668a31e2-0b6c-911d-5300-a0b2b5ded2a1@arm.com> From: Jeff Law Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 21:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 On 10/4/19 9:11 AM, Delia Burduv wrote: > Ping. Has anyone had a look at the patch? Please let me know if it is fine. I think it's fine to backport to the gcc-8 branch. Do you have commit access? jeff