From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>, Olivier Hainque <hainque@adacore.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Nicolas Roche <roche@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: fix libcc1 dependencies in toplevel Makefile
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 15:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f39aa71c-8d47-26d7-0481-fa1fec9b429a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ory3fku3a1.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>
On 06/11/2018 08:50 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> So I see two possible ways to go from now:
>
> 1. address the previously-mentioned fragility in the patch I posted, to
> catch all cases of postbootstrap targets and their deps on
> non-postbootstrap targets.
>
>
> 2. revamp the bootstrap/non-bootstrap dependencies, using GNU make
> conditionals rather than configure-time enable/disable-bootstrap, so
> that we can have a different set of dependencies while running the
> bootstrap proper, having non-stage dependencies activated by default
> when any of the all-* targets are named in the command line, and also
> when building post-bootstrap all-host all-target. This might seem to
> bring the problem back, but rather by having the full dependency set,
> we'd avoid the race not by refraining from reentering dirs, but rather
> by having them entered or reentered according to the full dependencies,
> without mixing stage and non-stage dependencies. I'm not yet sure this
> is actually doable, but it seems to me that if it is, it would be more
> robust than what we have now.
Your call. I've wanted the build system revamped for 20+ years, but
it's nontrivial and the most serious problems were addressed as we
continued to pull the runtime bits out of gcc/
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-12 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 12:58 Olivier Hainque
2017-06-14 11:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-06-14 21:11 ` Olivier Hainque
2017-06-15 12:03 ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-06-15 12:29 ` Olivier Hainque
2017-06-22 12:13 ` Alexandre Oliva
2017-06-26 7:41 ` Olivier Hainque
2017-06-27 16:32 ` Olivier Hainque
2017-06-27 19:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2017-07-03 21:05 ` Olivier Hainque
2018-06-03 19:13 ` Alexandre Oliva
2018-06-12 2:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2018-06-12 8:57 ` Olivier Hainque
2018-06-12 15:31 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2018-06-26 5:39 ` Alexandre Oliva
2018-06-27 19:53 ` Olivier Hainque
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f39aa71c-8d47-26d7-0481-fa1fec9b429a@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hainque@adacore.com \
--cc=oliva@gnu.org \
--cc=roche@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).