From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B38A3857C4C for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 9B38A3857C4C Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-13-C0QHSzYGMZeMcJI9OJutUA-1; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 15:42:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: C0QHSzYGMZeMcJI9OJutUA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09EEE800D62; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-161.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.161]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B041E5; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: AVR maintainership (was: [patch,avr, 1/3] Support 64-bit (long) double: The gcc part.) To: Segher Boessenkool , Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Georg-Johann Lay , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <268c2e7e-aca7-58fa-602c-6b9dafc133e7@gjlay.de> <3d2f9f74-fbde-8a19-e76b-5d0575298451@gjlay.de> <5E136A67.5010301@gjlay.de> <2269c664a9c38555a9d9422c7791b686123cd9ca.camel@redhat.com> <71171cc6-bbac-31bd-9fb5-cb969c7155d@pfeifer.com> <20201215143031.GC2672@gate.crashing.org> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:42:52 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201215143031.GC2672@gate.crashing.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:42:59 -0000 On 12/15/20 7:30 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:40:08AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Jeff Law wrote: >>>> p.s. You know anything about Denis Chertykov? He used to reply to avr >>>> patches within hours, but my latest patches (after a long period where I >>>> didn't propose any patches) where all approved by you; not a single mail >>>> from Denis. So I am concerned if he's well. Maybe he left you or some >>>> other global maintainer a note? He's still listed as maintainer though. >>> I haven't heard much from him for a while. I'm trying to leave enough >>> space that he can step in on this stuff, but I'm also hesitant to let >>> patches linger for too long. >> I don't think I have seen mails from Denis since then (more than >> eleven months). >> >> Do we need to get a new maintainer for AVR in place? Any nominations? > I nominate Georg-Johann Lay as the obvious choice, since he has authored > 333 of the 511 patches that went into config/avr/ the last ten years. I'd support that if Georg-Johann wants it. jeff