From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8C63850864 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BE8C63850864 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32I0cSZK014772; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:25 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : from : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=QIhB71RbBFs2WyZ+/tSpWk8LtQRlFBG0qc8QuqE/Ahs=; b=TyqMVlTM4kX2DtbFgq9YMID3GeM3/SVnDM6lwVm5aqAnUSnI22WFZyfCd6v5RLrcA8Y+ W3c0ACI6hX2KyeAFmZHCmQIBS31uFyHC0moW4UP5RbFKL+vh5+6dpvpTqaT/BGhlo2D+ cafjPfYJl+k+zfaYIDP0jdC5qGxnlSt8U/ZOgDnUeVe7Jg7WWIDQJp3USwPAC/ZH3Mvy PoiazM9lL3t12jS1jWGXkHx8r/iz+Vwb0k7WeyYhUCiufR/t1b3p1pPw64WoC2XsKaw8 x+9gKgxPwt82vzqL/k2HMmq4LeTn+20b46GuF9oS3sbgaWohmf+NaRNuBS2hM9uXYwKn fg== Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pd26jtcj5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32I04iGM026780; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:04 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.129.117]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pbsa06tu6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:03 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.101]) by smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 32I2V0mc31851220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:01 GMT Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982335805A; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3445A5805C; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.211.90.110] (unknown [9.211.90.110]) by smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:31:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 21:30:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Don't ICE when compiling the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in [PR109178] Content-Language: en-US From: Peter Bergner To: GCC Patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool , "Kewen.Lin" , Chip Kerchner References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: qKRW7hLWUAbu7YZnTtyU7U50ajXaIs2e X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: qKRW7hLWUAbu7YZnTtyU7U50ajXaIs2e X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-17_20,2023-03-16_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=627 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303150002 definitions=main-2303180022 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/17/23 7:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 3/17/23 5:35 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: >> When we expand the __builtin_vec_xst_trunc built-in, we use the wrong mode >> for the MEM operand which causes an unrecognizable insn ICE. The solution >> is to use the correct TMODE mode. >> >> Is this ok for trunk and gcc12 assuming my bootstraps and regtests show >> no regressions? > > The trunk bootstrap and regtests were clean. I'm still waiting on the > backport testing to finish. ...and the gcc12 backported bootstrap and regtest were clean too. Peter