From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 300B5385829D
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 04:23:33 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 300B5385829D
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site;
	s=default; t=1666931010;
	bh=5BV7Z5fmhKx3iXrwhK9EZTWwQKi4JCedS0g5TVXq3AU=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GA7XJYRxhm9a09GUPw7EAPEjaPrCfQR5dUo+l5ED8/QAMDnqkaFqETZT4Kzny2c4q
	 ib0kFArT0j5pnlhKIpXvtdvmuUVc3NaX5SwV6rZIlDFPhbhId3+v9eM+13zO/LkEMb
	 65G+IGMN47kAHOooMrMO6TlPWy05cEFQA+EhDSKs=
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	(Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
	by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6266465AEB;
	Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:23:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <f4c97e77124f28c4e3d43da92b4fcd7d52a2f051.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Libitm add RISC-V support.
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: fantasquex@gmail.com, Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:23:27 +0800
In-Reply-To: <mhng-9366d3ea-bf38-491e-8318-5fc74e40fd08@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
References: <mhng-9366d3ea-bf38-491e-8318-5fc74e40fd08@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 17:44 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> though I don't have an opinion on whether libitm should be taking ports=
=20
> to new targets, I'd never even heard of it before.

I asked this question to myself when I reviewed LoongArch libitm port.=20
But I remember one maintainer of Deepin (a distro) has complained that
some packages were depending on libitm (and/or libvtv).

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University