From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9654 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2019 18:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8966 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2019 18:04:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:737, H*f:sk:b57cac8, H*MI:sk:b57cac8, H*i:sk:b57cac8 X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:04:20 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572458658; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:openpgp:openpgp:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=bKGrz8U7WI8CCdk+DIwUCCv1T0Ykmc7SF6OLzFHn0hQ=; b=HD5rnf2gPhZ8EBNgHS4AVASxJDoLtUuSa2GtggsNwrQA8h+AqopBoUmu1hwV1yntB1EOrT WRiMImpolGkEm0sWsr/WsyTplGT93LEi9bGT2iT0CzWPu043YA0haQaVcYJauKkeYHGBrC Rjp9+a529+yl9w2+h6TjvYGkkpBpEos= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-302-XPNKqSjVM3Sehtb63E1gZA-1; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:04:15 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3886107ACC0; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-3.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C041001DE1; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Deprecating cc0 (and consequently cc0 targets) To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Gunther Nikl , Richard Sandiford Cc: Richard Biener , gcc-patches , Denis Chertykov , hp@axis.com, Andreas Schwab , Matt Thomas References: <61a6a83a-beec-24a2-7726-fba9e02f5ab9@physik.fu-berlin.de> <12e368c7-94db-1a42-6458-53596ebfb623@redhat.com> <20191030185252.000078d9@justmail.de> From: Jeff Law Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg02173.txt.bz2 On 10/30/19 11:57 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/30/19 6:52 PM, Gunther Nikl wrote: >> Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> FWIW it's already possible to do the transform you mention with: >>> >>> s/(cc0)/(reg:CC CC_REGNUM_RC)/g >>> >>> (define_int_iterator CC_REGNUM_RC [(CC_REGNUM "reload_completed")]) >> >> Since "reload_completed" is referenced, this is only about the CC0 >> conversion, right? Switching to LRA is not required for this step. >=20 > I think it would be nice though that anyone who does the cc0 transition > would also switch over to LRA unless that would be too much of a burden. True, but the priority is the cc0 transition. Jeff