From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DAB93858001; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:57:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4DAB93858001 Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id k4-20020a17090a5144b02901731c776526so21421159pjm.4; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ntvn77SqdpMaxDWQXb0JILw3zGR4AlApR/VxpFSIsAA=; b=ZpgkchAYhylKlzGRFUtP1uVNo4H18Fi0W5YeH7BIfwz9vo7lUcjnCI5CFEmmU3or4B Pj1K3kFZaX+i/sPHnTZV20eFlYW0Zsc1LvH/KZGpm5hvsjsTRDe1zYbxzHCltVruFCl5 0jgGmG8Ztdx/416O99NKfG9/zo7wQxTMv8+vM5qK5AZdJsBdqQdA73TDg+mukpeCcfn7 OkaWsZK4m5lj+TwkPrMausNbzBfBHPLT3E4CXOUn3EOUUuGbbkdp2XkLU5oqXKhapCWM 0lRIr+3MaP3GVodp+SzaLNPLmn3w35wtNnMiqQ4DOkop4oew7/lUp2NswKbIkbgYxQGe spOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Tr3S/OABVV1JeBto5S4dhy2ss3meTT2DJYLIC0V6yR0UE+jDH nAi4tC3nNYShPBDkFSWOxpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5EJND5ae48wESj1f5flJ8Ys6tBvGTWiQFL88XbYbHA9K815HvkXYBcyxItha3LuSMBMN66w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b8b:b029:12b:8d3e:70e7 with SMTP id w11-20020a1709027b8bb029012b8d3e70e7mr3005137pll.76.1627660642210; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.24] (65-130-1-109.slkc.qwest.net. [65.130.1.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n33sm3279956pgm.55.2021.07.30.08.57.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: PING^5: [PATCH] mips: add MSA vec_cmp and vec_cmpu expand pattern [PR101132] To: Xi Ruoyao , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, marxin@gcc.gnu.org, Matthew Fortune , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , richard.sandiford@arm.com References: <1c61137b2e714a8a45e2b078a79851acc2eb5b8c.camel@mengyan1223.wang> <4bd3eabc82dd007b1ed684aa2f1f720918740986.camel@mengyan1223.wang> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:57:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:57:24 -0000 On 7/30/2021 2:04 AM, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote: > Xi Ruoyao writes: >> Ping again. > Sorry that this has gone unreviewed for so long. I think in practice > the MIPS port is essentially unmaintained at this point -- it would > be great if someone would volunteer :-) Yup. > > It isn't really appropriate for me to review MIPS stuff given that I work > for a company that has a competing architecture. I think Jeff expressed > similar concerns given his new role. Right, I'm largely in the same boat as well.   I've been given a degree of freedom, but I'm very cognizant of not raising  conflict of interest concerns with my employer.  Some trivial patch review for a port is OK, but the more substantial it is, the closer it is to the line that I don't want to cross. Jeff