From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81836 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2018 21:00:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81710 invoked by uid 89); 20 Feb 2018 21:00:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wr0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f177.google.com) (209.85.128.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:00:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m5so18258485wrg.1; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:00:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=qTZrYnXGB0yw7v+kYel8NYLzc6aU3kny0zYJjagmmZk=; b=UBux5qiy37AQRn2Mr6q2Jw4nonLGA1/N1LhERx3wbsRk8yvMgjyTqYcinC0NEszhYd sSIjE2F7C4yXpu3yrmvT30Iw0kELmbJd39Oh5eq0r/stCvIY8GO5mpMufBr+3nKlcNEI +gKoiEvSFKCrppI1feCA8DLyBTOJ2EepWWxTGuqwr4XsL726Ly6zJBdmrYJk0KNbDKye 5Lt6kW/tm5aBjxRGKDco5tnDLF6iwLVa89qcZ9aG0tI/81CwxMI6Tcg90P2CcozVFz8r DR21uS+ifF3PD95K7QAltPR+NT725c5KYUhoXSjlIi1aIk80lel/B5tYuRvyoEcJJvmv M4gw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBkV2wwwUFCzsN8r9WnLXznnXRbhI9RACLW1asSsUnL1Wp+Focw KYYMU1d/xSBOeQEWRaprdOrCHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227WjO2Kh4mBeesI+v2UTzDk+Sa7UV7eVx7pqSEX4nzcXwTwBbMDVjD/IPTt7ET+P5H3qqMFZA== X-Received: by 10.28.22.201 with SMTP id 192mr224778wmw.45.1519160423913; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (arf62-1-82-237-250-248.fbx.proxad.net. [82.237.250.248]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l199sm10465731wmd.18.2018.02.20.13.00.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:00:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Extend aligned_membuf<> usage To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Jonathan Wakely , "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches References: <20180205171622.GG13489@redhat.com> <0edc65a5-d842-1b9e-111a-35275bd09397@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Dumont?= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg01197.txt.bz2 On 20/02/2018 20:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 8 February 2018 at 06:10, François Dumont wrote: >> On 06/02/2018 20:16, François Dumont wrote: >>> On 05/02/2018 18:16, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to simply make __aligned_buffer identical >>>> to __aligned_membuf for the versioned-namespace? Then at least the >>>> conditional code is only in one place. >>>> >>> Yes, __aligned_buffer is indeed not used, we could do that. I'll propose a >>> patch to do so. >>> >> So here it is, ok to commit ? > OK, because it only affects the gnu-versioned-namespace mode. > Ok, done now.