From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/91673 - ICE with noexcept in alias-declaration
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8a86b2a-fd7b-de88-c784-80dffbebfa1d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190907203735.GE14737@redhat.com>
On 9/7/19 3:37 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> * parser.c (CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NO_DELAY_NOEXCEPT): New parser flag.
Is it feasible to reverse this, and specifically delay parsing of
noexcept-specifications on member function declarations? When else
would we want it?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-07 20:37 Marek Polacek
2019-09-09 20:56 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2019-09-10 18:25 ` Marek Polacek
2019-09-10 20:58 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8a86b2a-fd7b-de88-c784-80dffbebfa1d@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).