From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94889 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2019 20:56:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94843 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2019 20:56:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:56:22 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA6781DEC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id a6so15931525qkl.10 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (209-6-216-142.s141.c3-0.smr-cbr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcncustomer.com. [209.6.216.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4sm7958201qkf.116.2019.09.09.13.56.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/91673 - ICE with noexcept in alias-declaration To: Marek Polacek , GCC Patches References: <20190907203735.GE14737@redhat.com> From: Jason Merrill Message-ID: Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190907203735.GE14737@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2 On 9/7/19 3:37 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > * parser.c (CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NO_DELAY_NOEXCEPT): New parser flag. Is it feasible to reverse this, and specifically delay parsing of noexcept-specifications on member function declarations? When else would we want it? Jason