From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Yury Gribov <tetra2005.patches@gmail.com>,
Ximin Luo <infinity0@pwned.gg>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PING^4][PATCH v2] Generate reproducible output independently of the build-path
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 15:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f911d109-83d1-c97e-fcbd-9f164556bf20@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565c6de9-2d85-24f9-faaf-6d8ac476b3a8@gmail.com>
On 08/02/2017 10:47 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 03.08.2017 3:06, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Jeff Law:
>>> On 07/21/2017 10:15 AM, Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>> (Please keep me on CC, I am not subscribed)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Proposal
>>>> ========
>>>>
>>>> This patch series adds a new environment variable
>>>> BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP. When
>>>> this is set, GCC will treat this as extra implicit
>>>> "-fdebug-prefix-map=$value"
>>>> command-line arguments that precede any explicit ones. This makes
>>>> the final
>>>> binary output reproducible, and also hides the unreproducible value
>>>> (the source
>>>> path prefixes) from CFLAGS et. al. which many build tools
>>>> (understandably)
>>>> embed as-is into their build output.
>>> I'd *really* avoid doing this with magic environment variables. Make it
>>> a first class option to the compiler. Yes, it means projects that want
>>> this behavior have to arrange to pass that flag to their compiler, but
>>> IMHO that's much preferred over environment variables.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> If by "first class option" you meant a command-line flag, GCC *already
>> has* that (-fdebug-prefix-map) > and it wasn't enough to achieve
>> reproducibility in many cases we tested.
>
> Shouldn't -fdebug-prefix-map be updated to use the same syntax as
> BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP?
Or a different option to cover what Ximin is trying to do with
BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP. BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP has to go, I'm not going
to approve it in that form. But I would seriously consider the same
functionality as a command line switch.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-03 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 16:16 Ximin Luo
2017-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] When remapping paths, only match whole path components Ximin Luo
2017-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] Use BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP envvar to transform __FILE__ Ximin Luo
2017-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] Use BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP envvar for debug-prefix-map Ximin Luo
2017-08-02 19:19 ` Jeff Law
2017-08-02 19:09 ` [PING^4][PATCH v2] Generate reproducible output independently of the build-path Jeff Law
2017-08-03 2:06 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-03 4:49 ` Yury Gribov
2017-08-03 11:46 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-04 8:40 ` Yury Gribov
2017-08-10 21:29 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-03 15:57 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2017-08-03 16:05 ` Jeff Law
2017-08-03 17:02 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-04 12:32 ` Matthias Klose
2017-08-04 13:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-08-10 21:15 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-04 16:05 ` Yury Gribov
2017-08-10 20:55 ` Ximin Luo
2017-08-11 2:53 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f911d109-83d1-c97e-fcbd-9f164556bf20@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=infinity0@pwned.gg \
--cc=tetra2005.patches@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).