From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD53386101D for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3DD53386101D Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id u7so11797279qtq.12 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:51:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gnZ0OeC3XxBukMyqfCgUlioIwBJAK9JvAUIcPqx4JpU=; b=hHgV+5M7gs7kG4sUY3vAU+pe8UZ3/KIACeSfOsZKL2uum39P2cSvjklQcNlSnONvnS WvqHLEG9Y2riovfIs2hSzxVc0fKm5DN/r5Y548rY4kjW4mYIaHOeLbwzarpJHW0/7S2Y wiuEoVBvKEDbwDDeq3AUAAKEx8voMPjIY6TiMFMLlGZMfHjC7XPuNiP13C9+AW61FYsz 55DRh8bCEDK0Msh/vS8MvuJaMW1l83c/8nd1Qtz6XE0La3z0Bg2oZlV9ADnHSbVsAvIp gO7TSlkYMkqgnv4k1/4KRUCDndo1n0ICA7Ea2hyXVM74ROXKviX39QCwhPvKgwS0/C/x oLgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RGqgRT/cm9d12J2hve7MW1gwDQiGKAmCn3B5ffGTI/GJ3ut0N Tsh+mQimBISptUKncZEFlqJp/3OjEp8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7gEAqvxSngax7KlrgCkCHoGl8ZWnMukRBW4pHp6hGFwb4cVGwJEabgx0NuXPhxTxS6CiwJw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5442:: with SMTP id d2mr64895qtq.178.1615906264599; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.41] (71-218-23-248.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.218.23.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14sm14843271qka.56.2021.03.16.07.51.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH][pushed] analyzer: document new param To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= , David Malcolm , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <73368dc8-396d-68f6-7cf0-ce87b8ad1063@gmail.com> <032afed2-67cc-9d20-9c03-753fe758b326@suse.cz> From: Martin Sebor Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:51:02 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <032afed2-67cc-9d20-9c03-753fe758b326@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:07 -0000 On 3/16/21 3:08 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 3/15/21 9:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >> Any plans to integrate it into the testsuite?  (That way we presumably >> wouldn't need to remember to run it by hand.) > > Likely not, I'm not so big friend with DejaGNU. > Are you willing to help me with that? I'm not a fan either but that's what we've got. And sure, I'll help if/when I can. I think it should be "straightforward" to rewrite the script in Expect (as much as anything is straightforward in Expect). Or, it could stay as is and be invoked from some .exp file in testsuite. Although is Python a required prerequisite for running the testsuite? If not, it might be better to either rewrite the script in something that is (e.g., AWK) or in Expect. Martin > > Thanks, > Martin