public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add __builtin_iseqsig()
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 23:10:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fce4f148-b2ca-7b74-1b67-8d70e19dd891@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBB026F5-5195-4323-9E8C-3CCED2CE3ACA@gmail.com>


On 9/21/22 03:40, FX via Gcc-patches wrote:
> ping*2
>
>
>
>> Le 9 sept. 2022 à 19:55, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> ping
>>
>>
>>> Le 1 sept. 2022 à 23:02, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Attached patch adds __builtin_iseqsig() to the middle-end and C family front-ends.
>>> Testing does not currently check whether the signaling part works, because with optimisation is actually does not (preexisting compiler bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106805)
>>>
>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
>>> OK to commit?
>>>
>>> (I’m not very skilled for middle-end hacking, so I’m sure there will be modifications to make.)
>>>
>>> FX
>>> <0001-Add-__builtin_iseqsig.patch>

Joseph, do you have bits in this space that are going to be landing 
soon, or is your C2X work focused elsewhere?  Are there other C2X 
routines we need to be proving builtins for?


Jeff


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-29  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 21:02 FX
2022-09-09 17:55 ` FX
2022-09-21  9:40   ` FX
2022-10-06  8:40     ` FX
2022-10-06 21:46       ` Joseph Myers
2023-06-06 18:15         ` FX Coudert
2023-06-13 16:49           ` FX Coudert
2023-06-26  8:59           ` FX Coudert
2023-07-12  9:39             ` FX Coudert
2023-07-19 14:48           ` FX Coudert
2023-07-20  7:17             ` Richard Biener
2022-10-29  5:10     ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-10-31 18:24       ` Joseph Myers
2022-10-31 19:15         ` FX
2022-10-31 22:35           ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-20 17:10           ` Jeff Law
2022-11-20 17:28             ` FX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fce4f148-b2ca-7b74-1b67-8d70e19dd891@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).