From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 108D83858403 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 14:29:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 108D83858403 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F06233E55; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:29:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.20.14.209] (unknown [203.142.74.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B27033E80; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 22:28:54 +0800 (WITA) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOCS] Mention removed ports in GCC 13. In-Reply-To: <4d8a7f11-28e7-83e7-e67d-85c471c94feb@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <81599714-1d80-5707-2c2c-34b8dd0975cd@pfeifer.com> <4d8a7f11-28e7-83e7-e67d-85c471c94feb@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-251926987-1662560581=:6023" X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-251926987-1662560581=:6023 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Martin Li¨ka wrote: > Thanks for the fix. Btw. have you removed the w3c validation script? I didn't remove it, but had to deactive automated notifications since the w3.org service started to employ some "are you a secure machine?" checks that appear to use Javascript or the like, breaking any automated use of that service. :-( So I literally have to click through notification e-mails and manually check the result in the browser; hence the delay. Gerald --8323328-251926987-1662560581=:6023--