From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=PDYX=BD=in.tum.de=thomas.neumann@sourceware.org>
Received: from mailout2.rbg.tum.de (mailout2.rbg.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0::202])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214053858C74
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 14 May 2023 22:35:05 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 214053858C74
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=in.tum.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=in.tum.de
Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (mailrelay1.in.tum.de [131.159.254.14])
	by mailout2.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81ECF4C0215;
	Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=in.tum.de;
	s=20220209; t=1684103703;
	bh=ZcPjW1jQrAeP8Ak+Dv4TuZPvcP/0avYZMsjxiA8AI6g=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=NFmYtL8+q7NCQs6/8pAiouULR68Mn/pZ1t1givV6VI4um4yZy3DPTOW4qlyb1yYOA
	 PYjJfvzCSCOaCBqqWI5lNlNIg+dgeo7Urd8L1WR+YaXbVxSQT2vwz9OVEjGADsDBvZ
	 JAeMhBQ8TGHhStcOmDnTef1fZRZXwQMgSwupnqIVMMFUs0ned8avi1W50fxsNoRYCJ
	 IBUuBlIBUnGbk+Cqk7HqARKoDy9fWzCHcwzo6XaFGk5X8onj3AFegtgvKJOPehuaE8
	 nBnL3pcDaR9mZ5utItyLWx7St3BfnChOo6Zdvmrg5sPwK+rqvzSZYFingsu0GXivfs
	 gfTMgrzJjpufw==
Received: by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 7C04819E; Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A87CD;
	Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.in.tum.de (mailproxy.in.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0::78])
	by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24B9624;
	Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 1D86F4A0210; Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (Authenticated sender: neumann)
	by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AC354A013B;
	Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:02 +0200 (CEST)
	(Extended-Queue-bit xtech_in@fff.in.tum.de)
Message-ID: <fdd1d4a3-5974-3942-f412-b5e8215b7c53@in.tum.de>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 00:35:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix assertion for unwind-dw2-fde.c btree changes
Content-Language: en-US
To: alice <alice@ayaya.dev>, =?UTF-8?Q?S=c3=b6ren_Tempel?=
 <soeren@soeren-tempel.net>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
References: <2TMB4YQOP1E1R.2QLW7HCD1NVF3@8pit.net>
 <23a59ecf-9f5e-4d55-9f31-48242b775ec7@in.tum.de>
 <CSM9H8S40UQT.3LTJGIJVGFQIP@sumire>
From: Thomas Neumann <thomas.neumann@in.tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <CSM9H8S40UQT.3LTJGIJVGFQIP@sumire>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

> even building the flatbuffers repo externally using cmake at the same revision
> didn't reproduce it.
> 
> that said, i have attached a dockerfile that shows you what /does/ fail, under
> the specific conditions. but there is no unpatched libgcc_s, so you'll have
> to do that part yourself, and build a libgcc_s.so.1 without the patch in this
> thread.

thanks for the dockerfile, I could reproduce the problem. For some 
strange reason the program really tried to register a frame table 
without entries. Perhaps that is caused by musl, I could not find the 
root cause for that. But nevertheless, fixing the assert is the right 
thing to do, we must ignore empty tables.

Best

Thomas