From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102783 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2018 17:07:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102767 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2018 17:07:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:0700 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:07:20 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.201]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:256) id 1fVgZi-0001ce-8j from Cesar_Philippidis@mentor.com ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:07:18 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:07:15 -0700 Subject: Re: [OpenACC] Update OpenACC data clause semantics to the 2.5 behavior - runtime To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Chung-Lin Tang , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <7fa7637f-e7f5-d43d-13f1-706c77e8e957@codesourcery.com> <836f376f-513d-dd29-9133-6526bfb59866@codesourcery.com> <20180620164506.GO7166@tucnak> <06069b0d-46dd-ec3d-d010-6cca6701bec8@codesourcery.com> <20180620170335.GP7166@tucnak> From: Cesar Philippidis Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180620170335.GP7166@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.204) To svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.201) X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg01272.txt.bz2 On 06/20/2018 10:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:59:29AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >> If it means anything, we have a significant async change that removes >> the async_refcount field in that struct. > > Wasn't async_refcount removed 2 years ago? You're right. I was looking at the og8 history. I'm juggling a lot of patches right now. Cesar