From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74018395252B for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 74018395252B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 2AG2OhMo003632; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : from : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=7WwFB0lkjhPCbyiuCruhlrCdTa0xNbfXHyyj+aEKDOA=; b=Qanr5Kau22zWFx/bJPfu1HhCiWdeOM9kzLOqvGdNsz3uaM69YYjbS7/9YtfWuf2TlGhg 4pFTMSgeiOrgfixWVwzyuyQW7A+hZlHByGJ7oSnmb8y/DGDZMMR+k0xItiea7Hnwgsbf TRy7mIXvchSRDiXycP+Fz2jLVEnotFh6gsRiwmKuHfVZQjcrTejJze0csOdsmBAKPpfa v9anM8oDn6azKcj4BWRQszF6gTtlLWHmzy5JjCGOsFm/r0ahGZUopsYA2e0HFXqTx9MI 9PpqQ8anDRWJSF8SKdLzmkzL1qkGtzSJaBMx0x6TSk4eU6dZYlw0WNoheMAdG5eSMznU yg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kvq2904jk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:17 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2AG2Qsw6012048; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:16 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kvq2904j6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:16 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2AG2KgJM024474; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:15 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3kt348w7ny-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:14 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2AG2XCCh1704602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:12 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD1B4C040; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECBB4C046; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.233.36] (unknown [9.197.233.36]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:33:10 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:33:08 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl: Try to remove EH edges after {pro,epi}logue generation [PR90259] Content-Language: en-US From: "Kewen.Lin" To: Eric Botcazou , Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Segher Boessenkool , Peter Bergner , Jeff Law References: <454e83e7-e7a2-6e10-e051-b33c2d1b580d@linux.ibm.com> <13136293.uLZWGnKmhe@fomalhaut> <5619427.DvuYhMxLoT@fomalhaut> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: PZxkulvi8EEmHPUCd1jhvBemN2Iz_9Bu X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: wP8wIzFh-vMniC_PscUf0XQKCQXGI7lC X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-11-15_08,2022-11-15_03,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=797 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2210170000 definitions=main-2211160016 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: on 2022/11/10 11:30, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2022/11/9 15:56, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>> The previous testings on powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu covered language Go, but >>> not Ada. I re-tested it with languages c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go,ada >>> on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, the result looked good. Both x86 and aarch64 >>> cfarm machines which I used for testing don't have gnat installed, do you >>> think testing Ada on ppc64le is enough? >> >> Sure, thanks for having done it! >> > > Thanks for confirming. > > I'm going to push this next Monday if there is no objection or further > comments in this week. > Committed in r13-4079. Do we want this to be backported a week later? BR, Kewen