From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64649 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2016 15:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 64639 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jun 2016 15:56:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 15:56:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58DE52D1252; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-42.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.42]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u59FuSYF009929; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:56:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] c/70883 - inconsistent error message for calls to __builtin_add_overflow with too few arguments To: Martin Sebor , Gcc Patch List , Jakub Jelinek References: <574F4EF6.2080507@gmail.com> <57578681.2080504@gmail.com> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 15:56:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57578681.2080504@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00700.txt.bz2 On 06/07/2016 08:44 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > Ping: This is a trivial patch to make the text of an error message > for an insufficient number of arguments to a built-in consistent > across different built-ins. Rather that sometimes saying "not > enough arguments" and others "too few arguments" the patch makes > GCC print "too few" in all cases. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00093.html OK. jeff