From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdr@codesourcery.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, aoliva@redhat.com
Subject: Re: none
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:41:00 -0000
Message-id: <flzog7f4ti.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
References: <200101311557.f0VFvCR04089@debye.wins.uva.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg02320.html

Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl> writes:

[...]

| I don't have any checkin priviliges.  Besides, my patch did delete the
| Cygwin specific code because I believed that it wasn't necessary
| anymore, but nobody verified this.  And Daniel Berlin was looking at
| BeOS and said he would submit a patch, and I more or less assumed that
| would include the sigsetjmp() stuff too since he said it did solve
| some BeOS-specific problems too.
| 
| Anyway, Alexandres patch looks good to me, and even addresses the
| possibility that sigsetjmp is absent.  So I'm all for it to apply his
| patch instead.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| Tested on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu, with and without -DHAVE_SIGSETJMP.
| The latter compiled, but would never complete, as before.  Ok to
| install?

Alexandre, can't it be possible to detect HAVE_SIGSETJUMP through
autoconf?  I would prefer an autocoonf-based solution.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com