public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Roman Zhuykov <zhroma@ispras.ru>,
	"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	 Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>,
	nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [arm] Implement Armv8.1-M low overhead loops
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gkr5zfubtqo.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tv3g6l6f.fsf@arm.com> (Andrea Corallo's message of "Mon, 24	Feb 2020 15:48:24 +0000")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1941 bytes --]

Hi all,

Third version of the patch here addressing comments.

This patch enables the Armv8.1-M Mainline LOB (low overhead branch) extension
low overhead loops (LOL) feature by using the 'loop-doloop' pass.

Given the following function:

void
loop (int *a)
{
  for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
    a[i] = i;
}

'doloop_begin' and 'doloop_end' patterns translates into 'dls' and 'le'
giving:

 loop:
         movw    r2, #10000
         movs    r3, #0
         subs    r0, r0, #4
         push    {lr}
         dls     lr, r2
 .L2:
         str     r3, [r0, #4]!
         adds    r3, r3, #1
         le      lr, .L2
         ldr     pc, [sp], #4

bootstrapped arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, do not introduce testsuite regressions.

Andrea

gcc/ChangeLog:

2020-??-??  Andrea Corallo  <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
            Mihail-Calin Ionescu  <mihail.ionescu@arm.com>
            Iain Apreotesei  <iain.apreotesei@arm.com>

        * config/arm/arm.c (TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP):
        (arm_invalid_within_doloop): Implement invalid_within_doloop hook.
        * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_HAVE_LOB): Add new macro.
        * config/arm/thumb2.md (*doloop_end, doloop_begin, dls_insn):
        Add new patterns.
        * config/arm/unspecs.md: Add new unspec.
        * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_v8_1_lob_ok): Document new target
	supports option.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-??-??  Andrea Corallo  <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
            Mihail-Calin Ionescu  <mihail.ionescu@arm.com>
            Iain Apreotesei  <iain.apreotesei@arm.com>

        * gcc.target/arm/lob.h: New header.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob1.c: New testcase.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob2.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob3.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob4.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob5.c: Likewise.
        * gcc.target/arm/lob6.c: Likewise.
        * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok):
        New proc.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: lol.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 14270 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
index e07cf03538c5..1269f40bd77c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
@@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ extern int arm_arch_bf16;
 \f
 /* Target machine storage Layout.  */
 
+/* Nonzero if this chip provides Armv8.1-M Mainline
+   LOB (low overhead branch features) extension instructions.  */
+#define TARGET_HAVE_LOB (arm_arch8_1m_main)
 
 /* Define this macro if it is advisable to hold scalars in registers
    in a wider mode than that declared by the program.  In such cases,
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 9cc7bc0e5621..7c2a7b7e9e97 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -833,6 +833,9 @@ static const struct attribute_spec arm_attribute_table[] =
 #undef TARGET_CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT
 #define TARGET_CONSTANT_ALIGNMENT arm_constant_alignment
 
+#undef TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP
+#define TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP arm_invalid_within_doloop
+
 #undef TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST
 #define TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST arm_md_asm_adjust
 \f
@@ -32937,6 +32940,27 @@ arm_ge_bits_access (void)
   return true;
 }
 
+/* NULL if INSN insn is valid within a low-overhead loop.
+   Otherwise return why doloop cannot be applied.  */
+
+static const char *
+arm_invalid_within_doloop (const rtx_insn *insn)
+{
+  if (!TARGET_HAVE_LOB)
+    return default_invalid_within_doloop (insn);
+
+  if (CALL_P (insn))
+    return "Function call in the loop.";
+
+  if (tablejump_p (insn, NULL, NULL) || computed_jump_p (insn))
+    return "Computed branch in the loop.";
+
+  if (reg_mentioned_p (gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM), insn))
+    return "LR is used inside loop.";
+
+  return NULL;
+}
+
 #if CHECKING_P
 namespace selftest {
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
index b0d3bd1cf1c4..fab993a8079f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
@@ -1555,8 +1555,11 @@
       using a certain 'count' register and (2) the loop count can be
       adjusted by modifying this register prior to the loop.
       ??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize the
-      new IV can potentially affect branch optimizations.  */
-   if (optimize > 0 && flag_modulo_sched)
+      new IV can potentially affect branch optimizations.
+
+      Also used to implement the low over head loops feature, which is part of
+      the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low Overhead Branch (LOB) extension.  */
+   if (optimize > 0 && (flag_modulo_sched || TARGET_HAVE_LOB))
    {
      rtx s0;
      rtx bcomp;
@@ -1569,6 +1572,11 @@
        FAIL;
 
      s0 = operands [0];
+
+     /* Low over head loop instructions require the first operand to be LR.  */
+     if (TARGET_HAVE_LOB)
+       s0 = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, LR_REGNUM);
+
      if (TARGET_THUMB2)
        insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
      else
@@ -1650,3 +1658,30 @@
   "TARGET_HAVE_MVE"
   "lsrl%?\\t%Q0, %R0, %1"
   [(set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
+
+;; Originally expanded by 'doloop_end'.
+(define_insn "*doloop_end_internal"
+  [(parallel [(set (pc)
+                   (if_then_else
+                       (ne (reg:SI LR_REGNUM) (const_int 1))
+                     (label_ref (match_operand 0 "" ""))
+                     (pc)))
+              (set (reg:SI LR_REGNUM)
+                   (plus:SI (reg:SI LR_REGNUM) (const_int -1)))])]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  "le\t%|lr, %l0")
+
+(define_expand "doloop_begin"
+  [(match_operand 0 "" "")
+   (match_operand 1 "" "")]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  {
+    emit_insn (gen_dls_insn (operands[0]));
+    DONE;
+  })
+
+(define_insn "dls_insn"
+  [(set (reg:SI LR_REGNUM)
+        (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "r")] UNSPEC_DLS))]
+  "TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HAVE_LOB"
+  "dls\t%|lr, %0")
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
index 8f4a705f43ef..df5ecb731925 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
   UNSPEC_SMUADX		; Represent the SMUADX operation.
   UNSPEC_SSAT16		; Represent the SSAT16 operation.
   UNSPEC_USAT16		; Represent the USAT16 operation.
+  UNSPEC_DLS		; Used for DLS (Do Loop Start), Armv8.1-M Mainline instruction
 ])
 
 
diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 1f412ded2bb7..5b9e0399ebc1 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
@@ -1945,6 +1945,12 @@ ARM Target supports options suitable for accessing the Q-bit manipulation
 intrinsics from @code{arm_acle.h}.
 Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options.
 
+@item arm_v8_1_lob_ok
+@anchor{arm_v8_1_lob_ok}
+ARM Target supports executing the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low Overhead Loop
+instructions @code{DLS} and @code{LE}.
+Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options.
+
 @end table
 
 @subsubsection AArch64-specific attributes
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..feaae7cc8995
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+#include <string.h>
+
+/* Common code for lob tests.  */
+
+#define NO_LOB asm volatile ("@ clobber lr" : : : "lr" )
+
+#define N 10000
+
+static void
+reset_data (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  memset (a, -1, N * sizeof (*a));
+  memset (b, -1, N * sizeof (*b));
+  memset (c, -1, N * sizeof (*c));
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b92dc551d50b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   for some simple loops.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_ok } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+    }
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  int i = 0;
+  while (i < N)
+    {
+      a[i] = i - 2;
+      b[i] = i * 5;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+      i++;
+    }
+}
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop3 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  int i = 0;
+  do
+    {
+      a[i] = i - 4;
+      b[i] = i * 3;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+      i++;
+    } while (i < N);
+}
+
+void
+check (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      NO_LOB;
+      if (c[i] != a[i] + b[i])
+	abort ();
+    }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop1 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop2 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+  reset_data (a, b, c);
+  loop3 (a, b ,c);
+  check (a, b ,c);
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {le\slr,\s\S*} 3 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1fe9a9d82bb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if a non-inlineable function call takes place inside the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int __attribute__ ((noinline))
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = foo (a[i], b[i]);
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..17cba007ccb6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if causes VFP emulation library calls to happen inside the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+double a[N];
+double b[N];
+double c[N];
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = a[i] + b[i];
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..444a2c7b4bfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   if LR is modified within the loop.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+static __attribute__ ((always_inline)) inline int
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  NO_LOB;
+  return a + b;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+      c[i] = foo(a[i], b[i]);
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c4f46e41532b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* Check that GCC does not generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop
+   instructions.  Innermost loop has no fixed number of iterations
+   therefore is not optimizable.  Outer loops are not optimized.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+int a[N];
+int b[N];
+int c[N];
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      a[i] = i;
+      b[i] = i * 2;
+
+      int k = b[i];
+      while (k != 0)
+	{
+	  if (k % 2 == 0)
+	    c[i - 1] = k % 2;
+	  k /= 2;
+	}
+      c[i] = a[i] - b[i];
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {le\slr,\s\S*} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..95db2f47efe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/* Check that GCC generates Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
+   with some less trivial loops and the result is correct.  */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1_lob_ok } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -O3 --save-temps" } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "lob.h"
+
+#define TEST_CODE1				\
+  {						\
+    for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)			\
+      {						\
+	a[i] = i;				\
+	b[i] = i * 2;				\
+						\
+	for (int k = 0; k < N; k++)		\
+	  {					\
+	    MAYBE_LOB;				\
+	    c[k] = k / 2;			\
+	  }					\
+	c[i] = a[i] - b[i];			\
+      }						\
+  }
+
+#define TEST_CODE2				\
+  {						\
+    for (int i = 0; i < N / 2; i++)		\
+      {						\
+	MAYBE_LOB;				\
+	if (c[i] % 2 == 0)			\
+	  break;				\
+	a[i]++;					\
+	b[i]++;					\
+      }						\
+  }
+
+int a1[N];
+int b1[N];
+int c1[N];
+
+int a2[N];
+int b2[N];
+int c2[N];
+
+#define MAYBE_LOB
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE1;
+
+void __attribute__((noinline))
+loop2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE2;
+
+#undef MAYBE_LOB
+#define MAYBE_LOB NO_LOB
+
+void
+ref1 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE1;
+
+void
+ref2 (int *a, int *b, int *c)
+  TEST_CODE2;
+
+void
+check (void)
+{
+  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      NO_LOB;
+      if (a1[i] != a2[i]
+	  && b1[i] != b2[i]
+	  && c1[i] != c2[i])
+	abort ();
+    }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
+  reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+  loop1 (a1, b1, c1);
+  ref1 (a2, b2, c2);
+  check ();
+
+  reset_data (a1, b1, c1);
+  reset_data (a2, b2, c2);
+  loop2 (a1, b1, c1);
+  ref2 (a2, b2, c2);
+  check ();
+
+  return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {dls\s\S*,\s\S*} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {le\slr,\s\S*} 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index d3b2798df3e8..51669aac1327 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -9807,6 +9807,28 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_3a_bkey_directive { } {
 	}]
 }
 
+# Return 1 if the target supports executing the Armv8.1-M Mainline Low
+# Overhead Loop, 0 otherwise.  The test is valid for ARM.
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok { } {
+    if { ![istarget arm*-*-*] } {
+        return 0;
+    } else {
+	return [check_runtime arm_v8_1_lob_hw_available {
+		int
+		main (void)
+	        { int i = 0;
+		  asm  ("movw r3, #10\n\t" /* movs? */
+			"dls lr, r3" : : : "r3", "lr");
+		 loop:
+		  i++;
+		  asm goto ("le lr, %l0" : : : "lr" : loop);
+		  return i != 10;
+		}
+	} "-march=armv8.1-m.main" ]
+    }
+}
+
 # Returns 1 if the target is using glibc, 0 otherwise.
 
 proc check_effective_target_glibc { } {

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-11 10:15 Andrea Corallo
2020-02-11 11:01 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-02-11 13:40   ` Andrea Corallo
2020-02-12  9:23     ` Roman Zhuykov
2020-02-13 17:54       ` Andrea Corallo
2020-02-19 13:01       ` Andrea Corallo
2020-02-21 15:31         ` Kyrill Tkachov
2020-02-21 15:49           ` Roman Zhuykov
2020-02-21 15:53             ` Kyrill Tkachov
2020-02-21 15:41         ` Roman Zhuykov
2020-02-24 15:48           ` Andrea Corallo
2020-02-25 14:57             ` Andrea Corallo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gkr5zfubtqo.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=zhroma@ispras.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).