public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	 nd <nd@arm.com>, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm: [testsuite] fix lob tests for -mfloat-abi=hard
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 11:12:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gkrblfdu95t.fsf_-_@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gkrft4vt7jb.fsf@arm.com> (Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches's message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:31:52 +0100")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]

Hi all,

second version of this patch here fixing lob[2-5].c tests for hard float
abi targets implementing Kyrill's suggestions.

Okay for trunk?

  Andrea


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-arm-testsuite-fix-lob-tests-for-mfloat-abi-hard.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3425 bytes --]

From f7f36b243c82a5dd49540cc48ceb8ce636872d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:33:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: [testsuite] fix lob tests for -mfloat-abi=hard

2020-11-26  Andrea Corallo  <andrea.corallo@arm.com>

	* gcc.target/arm/lob2.c: Use '-march=armv8.1-m.main+fp'.
	* gcc.target/arm/lob3.c: Skip with '-mfloat-abi=hard'.
	* gcc.target/arm/lob4.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.target/arm/lob5.c: Use '-march=armv8.1-m.main+fp'.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c | 2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
index fdeb2686f51..d174857b926 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob2.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
    if a non-inlineable function call takes place inside the loop.  */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include "lob.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
index 70314ea84b3..f5290063f28 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob3.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
    if causes VFP emulation library calls to happen inside the loop.  */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" "-mfloat-abi=hard" } } */
 /* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
 #include <stdlib.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
index 792f352d682..86c774e1b57 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob4.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* Check that GCC does not generate Armv8.1-M low over head loop instructions
    if LR is modified within the loop.  */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" "-mfloat-abi=hard" } } */
 /* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_softfloat } */
 #include <stdlib.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
index 1a6adf1e28e..df5383b4a26 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob5.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    therefore is not optimizable.  Outer loops are not optimized.  */
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-* } { "-marm" "-mcpu=*" } } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -mthumb -O3 --save-temps" } */
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include "lob.h"
 
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-01 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-26 13:53 [PATCH] " Andrea Corallo
2020-11-26 14:34 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-11-26 16:48   ` Andrea Corallo
2020-11-27 10:31     ` Andrea Corallo
2020-12-01 10:12       ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2020-12-08 11:09         ` [PATCH V2] " Andrea Corallo
2020-12-11 11:21         ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2020-12-11 14:25           ` Andrea Corallo
2020-11-26 14:34 ` [PATCH] " Kyrylo Tkachov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gkrblfdu95t.fsf_-_@arm.com \
    --to=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
    --cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).