public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Pat Haugen <pthaugen@linux.ibm.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, wschmidt@linux.ibm.com,
	segher@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] correct COUNT and PROB for unrolled loop
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:15:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <h48367wqwlo.fsf@genoa.aus.stglabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h484kul5bkq.fsf@genoa.aus.stglabs.ibm.com> (Jiufu Guo's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:21:25 +0800")

Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> writes:

Hi,

I'd like to ping this patch for trunk on stage 1.

This patch could fix the issue on incorrect COUNT/FREQUENCES of loop
unrolled blocks, and also could help the improve the cold/hot issue of
the unrolled loops.

patch is also at
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00927.html

Thanks,
Jiufu

> Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ping following patch. As near end of gcc10 stage 4, it seems
> I would ask approval for GCC11 trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiufu Guo
>
>> Hi Honza and all,
>>
>> I updated the patch a little as below. Bootstrap and regtest are ok
>> on powerpc64le.
>>
>> Is OK for trunk?
>>
>> Thanks for comments.
>> Jiufu
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/cfgloopmanip.c b/gcc/cfgloopmanip.c
>> index 727e951..ded0046 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cfgloopmanip.c
>> +++ b/gcc/cfgloopmanip.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>  #include "gimplify-me.h"
>>  #include "tree-ssa-loop-manip.h"
>>  #include "dumpfile.h"
>> +#include "cfgrtl.h"
>>  
>>  static void copy_loops_to (class loop **, int,
>>  			   class loop *);
>> @@ -1258,14 +1259,30 @@ duplicate_loop_to_header_edge (class loop *loop, edge e,
>>  	  /* If original loop is executed COUNT_IN times, the unrolled
>>  	     loop will account SCALE_MAIN_DEN times.  */
>>  	  scale_main = count_in.probability_in (scale_main_den);
>> +
>> +	  /* If we are guessing at the number of iterations and count_in
>> +	     becomes unrealistically small, reset probability.  */
>> +	  if (!(count_in.reliable_p () || loop->any_estimate))
>> +	    {
>> +	      profile_count new_count_in = count_in.apply_probability (scale_main);
>> +	      profile_count preheader_count = loop_preheader_edge (loop)->count ();
>> +	      if (new_count_in.apply_scale (1, 10) < preheader_count)
>> +		scale_main = profile_probability::likely ();
>> +	    }
>> +
>>  	  scale_act = scale_main * prob_pass_main;
>>  	}
>>        else
>>  	{
>> +	  profile_count new_loop_count;
>>  	  profile_count preheader_count = e->count ();
>> -	  for (i = 0; i < ndupl; i++)
>> -	    scale_main = scale_main * scale_step[i];
>>  	  scale_act = preheader_count.probability_in (count_in);
>> +	  /* Compute final preheader count after peeling NDUPL copies.  */
>> +	  for (i = 0; i < ndupl; i++)
>> +	    preheader_count = preheader_count.apply_probability (scale_step[i]);
>> +	  /* Subtract out exit(s) from peeled copies.  */
>> +	  new_loop_count = count_in - (e->count () - preheader_count);
>> +	  scale_main = new_loop_count.probability_in (count_in);
>>  	}
>>      }
>>  
>> @@ -1381,6 +1398,38 @@ duplicate_loop_to_header_edge (class loop *loop, edge e,
>>  	  scale_bbs_frequencies (new_bbs, n, scale_act);
>>  	  scale_act = scale_act * scale_step[j];
>>  	}
>> +
>> +      /* Need to update PROB of exit edge and corresponding COUNT.  */
>> +      if (orig && is_latch && (!bitmap_bit_p (wont_exit, j + 1))
>> +	  && bbs_to_scale)
>> +	{
>> +	  edge new_exit = new_spec_edges[SE_ORIG];
>> +	  profile_count new_count_in = new_exit->src->count;
>> +	  profile_count preheader_count = loop_preheader_edge (loop)->count ();
>> +	  edge e;
>> +	  edge_iterator ei;
>> +
>> +	  FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, new_exit->src->succs)
>> +	    if (e != new_exit)
>> +	      break;
>> +
>> +	  gcc_assert (e && e != new_exit);
>> +
>> +	  new_exit->probability = preheader_count.probability_in (new_count_in);
>> +	  e->probability = new_exit->probability.invert ();
>> +
>> +	  profile_count new_latch_count
>> +	    = new_exit->src->count.apply_probability (e->probability);
>> +	  profile_count old_latch_count = e->dest->count;
>> +
>> +	  EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (bbs_to_scale, 0, i, bi)
>> +	    scale_bbs_frequencies_profile_count (new_bbs + i, 1,
>> +						 new_latch_count,
>> +						 old_latch_count);
>> +
>> +	  if (current_ir_type () != IR_GIMPLE)
>> +	    update_br_prob_note (e->src);
>> +	}
>>      }
>>    free (new_bbs);
>>    free (orig_loops);
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68212.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68212.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f3b7c22
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr68212.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vectorize -funroll-loops --param max-unroll-times=4 -fdump-rtl-alignments" } */
>> +
>> +void foo(long int *a, long int *b, long int n)
>> +{
>> +  long int i;
>> +
>> +  for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> +    a[i] = *b;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "internal loop alignment added" 1 "alignments"} } */
>> +

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-03  8:17 [PATCH] " Jiufu Guo
2020-02-03 16:04 ` Pat Haugen
2020-02-03 16:20   ` Jeff Law
2020-02-03 16:23     ` Jan Hubicka
2020-02-11  2:29       ` Jiufu Guo
2020-02-17  6:23         ` [PATCH V2] " Jiufu Guo
2020-02-28  7:56           ` Jiufu Guo
2020-03-19  2:21           ` Jiufu Guo
2020-05-19  6:15             ` Jiufu Guo [this message]
2020-06-03  5:22               ` [PATCH V2] PING^ " Jiufu Guo
2020-06-18  1:22                 ` [PATCH V2] PING^2 " Jiufu Guo
2020-07-02  2:35                   ` Jiufu Guo
2020-07-09 11:55                     ` Martin Liška
2020-07-10  2:14                       ` Jiufu Guo
2020-07-10  7:37                         ` Martin Liška
2020-07-10 13:09                           ` Jiufu Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=h48367wqwlo.fsf@genoa.aus.stglabs.ibm.com \
    --to=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=pthaugen@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).