public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC patch: invariant addresses too cheap
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <hch59e$tpv$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878werq41v.fsf@firetop.home>

On 10/31/2009 10:57 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> So either I need to hack MIPS so that
> 2 is cheap and 3+ is "expensive", or we need some better way
> of determining this.

-  return mips_address_insns (addr, SImode, false);
+  int insns = mips_address_insns (addr, SImode, false);
+  return insns == 1 ? 1 : COSTS_N_INSNS (insns - 1);

?

> I don't think sticking an x86-specific magic number in the
> middle of generic code is acceptable, regardless of how big
> the comment above it is. ;)

That's why I suggested using "<= COSTS_N_INSNS (1) / 2" instead of "< 
3".  Also ix86-specific calibration, but not so brutally. :-)

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-31 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-19 16:17 Michael Matz
2009-10-19 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-20  9:04   ` Richard Guenther
2009-10-20 12:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-20 16:00       ` Michael Matz
2009-10-20 16:06         ` Richard Guenther
2009-10-31 10:05       ` Richard Sandiford
2009-10-31 11:14         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2009-10-31 11:16           ` Richard Guenther
2009-10-31 12:56             ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-31 13:53               ` Richard Sandiford
2009-10-31 14:31                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-01 10:24                   ` Richard Sandiford
2009-11-01 10:25                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-14 11:19                     ` Richard Sandiford
2009-11-15 16:50                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-15 21:36                         ` Richard Sandiford
2009-11-28 10:53                           ` Richard Sandiford
2009-12-01 13:05                             ` Michael Matz
2009-12-02 22:24                               ` Richard Sandiford
2009-12-03 12:57                                 ` Michael Matz
2009-11-17 18:02                 ` Mark Mitchell
2009-10-31 19:23         ` Michael Matz
2009-11-01 10:13           ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='hch59e$tpv$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).