From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6961 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2003 21:27:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6953 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 21:27:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO desire.geoffk.org) (12.235.88.42) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 21:27:28 -0000 Received: (from geoffk@localhost) by desire.geoffk.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h6HLNaw25544; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:23:36 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: desire.geoffk.org: geoffk set sender to geoffk@geoffk.org using -f To: Josef Zlomek CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch References: <20030717171823.GA9431@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> From: Geoff Keating Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030717171823.GA9431@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg01846.txt.bz2 Josef Zlomek writes: > Hi, > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00800.html > (Fix latent bug in cfgcleanup.c) > > Jump table was not recognized in some situations and thus jump table was > not moved together with the previous block. Isn't the BARRIER supposed to be *after* the jump table? -- - Geoffrey Keating