From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-53418-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14548 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 07:54:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14421 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 07:54:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 07:54:46 -0000
Received: from berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (berlin.act-europe.fr [212.157.227.169])
	by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1F3CB229E46; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:54:45 +0100 (MET)
Received: by berlin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 546)
	id 02FA290D; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:54:44 +0100 (CET)
To: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: law@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Don't use lib2funcs.asm on PA
References: <200202181933.g1IJXfCe012910@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 02:24:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200202181933.g1IJXfCe012910@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Message-ID: <ktn0y5zz23.fsf@berlin.int.act-europe.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg01284.txt.bz2


"John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> writes:

> I will investigate.  This code appears in the rs6000 code.  I think the
> answer must be that sa is 0 in a normal return.
[...] 
> Yes, see line 3180 in expand_eh_return in except.c.

 Oh, indeed, had forgotten about that. Sorry for the confusion. This bit
 in the epilogue deserves a comment I would say :) 

 Olivier