From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 415 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2011 13:47:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 403 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2011 13:47:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:46:57 +0000 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so1476441fxg.20 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.1.201 with SMTP id 9mr1127511fag.91.1313675216053; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richards-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com (gbibp9ph1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com [195.212.29.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm1743310faw.42.2011.08.18.06.46.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:46:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Ramana Radhakrishnan Mail-Followup-To: Ramana Radhakrishnan ,"Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@linaro.org Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [ARM] PR 50090: aliases in libgcc.a with default visibility References: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Ramana Radhakrishnan's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:37:31 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg01483.txt.bz2 Ramana Radhakrishnan writes: > On 17 August 2011 15:07, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> >>> libgcc/ >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PR target/50090 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * config/arm/bpabi-lib.h (RENAME_LIBRARY): Use a C= -level alias >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 instead of an assembly one. >> >> Is RENAME_LIBRARY_SET used at all after this patch or should it be >> removed? > > A patch to remove that is pre-approved provided ofcourse this patch > has been applied :) Thanks. Here's what I applied after testing on arm-linux-gnueabi. Based on your and Richard's OKs, I'll backport both patches to the release branches next week unless a release maintainer objects. Richard