public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
@ 2007-01-08 18:04 Nick Clifton
  2007-01-08 18:38 ` DJ Delorie
  2007-01-08 21:00 ` Andreas Tobler
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2007-01-08 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dj; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches

Hi DJ,

  I have applied the patch below on behalf of Kai Tietz.  This was
  part of a larger patch that allows the x86_64 mingw port to use
  either mingw32 or mingw64 as the third part of the triplet:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00235.html

  Am I correct in assuming that your synchronisation scripts will
  bring this change into the sourceware repository, or should I apply
  the patch there as well ?

Cheers
  Nick

ChangeLog
2007-01-08  Kai Tietz	<kai.tietz@onevision.com>

	* configure.in: Add support for an x86_64-mingw* target.

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
--- configure.in	(revision 120570)
+++ configure.in	(working copy)
@@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ case "${host}" in
   i[[3456789]]86-*-go32* | i[[3456789]]86-*-msdosdjgpp*)
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs tcl tk expect dejagnu send-pr uudecode guile itcl gnuserv libffi"
     ;;
+  x86_64-*-mingw*)
+    noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect dejagnu autoconf automake send-pr rcs guile perl texinfo libtool newlib"
+    ;;
   i[[3456789]]86-*-mingw32*)
     # noconfigdirs="tcl tk expect dejagnu make texinfo bison patch flex byacc send-pr uudecode dejagnu diff guile perl itcl gnuserv"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect dejagnu autoconf automake send-pr rcs guile perl texinfo libtool newlib"
@@ -619,6 +622,10 @@ case "${target}" in
     target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-winsup"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect target-libgloss target-newlib ${libgcj}"
     ;;    
+  x86_64-*-mingw*)
+    target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-winsup"
+    noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect target-libgloss target-newlib ${libgcj}"
+    ;;    
   *-*-cygwin*)
     target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-libtermcap target-winsup"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-gperf target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
@@ -934,6 +941,8 @@ case "${host}" in
     ;;
   *-mingw32*)
     ;;
+  *-mingw64*)
+    ;;
   *-interix*)
     host_makefile_frag="config/mh-interix"
     ;;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
  2007-01-08 18:04 Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure Nick Clifton
@ 2007-01-08 18:38 ` DJ Delorie
  2007-01-08 21:00 ` Andreas Tobler
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2007-01-08 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nickc; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches


>   Am I correct in assuming that your synchronisation scripts will
>   bring this change into the sourceware repository, or should I apply
>   the patch there as well ?

The toplevel scripts only advise the build maintainers that they're
out of sync.  We have to manually sync those because they're
bidirectional and sometimes messy, and I haven't had the time or
desire to write the scripts needed to automate it.

The libiberty/ and include/ scripts do everything but the final commit
automatically (I have to push the "yes, please" button manually), and
always from gcc->src.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
  2007-01-08 18:04 Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure Nick Clifton
  2007-01-08 18:38 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2007-01-08 21:00 ` Andreas Tobler
  2007-01-09  7:38   ` Nick Clifton
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Tobler @ 2007-01-08 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: dj, gcc-patches, gdb-patches

Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi DJ,
> 
>   I have applied the patch below on behalf of Kai Tietz.  This was
>   part of a larger patch that allows the x86_64 mingw port to use
>   either mingw32 or mingw64 as the third part of the triplet:
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00235.html
> 
>   Am I correct in assuming that your synchronisation scripts will
>   bring this change into the sourceware repository, or should I apply
>   the patch there as well ?
> 
> Cheers
>   Nick
> 
> ChangeLog
> 2007-01-08  Kai Tietz	<kai.tietz@onevision.com>
> 
> 	* configure.in: Add support for an x86_64-mingw* target.

Don't you need to regenerate configure ?
Btw, which version of autoconf do we use now?

Andreas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
  2007-01-08 21:00 ` Andreas Tobler
@ 2007-01-09  7:38   ` Nick Clifton
  2007-01-09 13:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2007-01-09  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Tobler, dj; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches

Hi Andreas,

>>     * configure.in: Add support for an x86_64-mingw* target.
> 
> Don't you need to regenerate configure ?

Oops!  Yes I do.

> Btw, which version of autoconf do we use now?

I always go by the version embedded at the top of the current configure 
file.  So in this case I used 2.13.  I am expecting this to change at 
some point in the near future though.

Cheers
   Nick

PS.  DJ: I have applied the patch to the sourceware repository and 
checked it in there as well.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
  2007-01-09  7:38   ` Nick Clifton
@ 2007-01-09 13:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2007-01-09 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: Andreas Tobler, dj, gcc-patches, gdb-patches

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:38:33AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> I always go by the version embedded at the top of the current configure 
> file.  So in this case I used 2.13.  I am expecting this to change at 
> some point in the near future though.

Yes indeed.  I'm just waiting to make sure there aren't any more
problems with top level libgcc before I change anything else in
the build system, but I have a patch to move the top level to autoconf
2.5x and I will be resubmitting it soon.  After that we'll probably
migrate the whole tree up to 2.61 at some point.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 13:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-08 18:04 Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure Nick Clifton
2007-01-08 18:38 ` DJ Delorie
2007-01-08 21:00 ` Andreas Tobler
2007-01-09  7:38   ` Nick Clifton
2007-01-09 13:45     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).