From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-185525-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27921 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2007 18:04:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 27910 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2007 18:04:29 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:04:17 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l08I4FXF008995; 	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:04:15 -0500
Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l08I4DtJ024274; 	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:04:14 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain.redhat.com (vpn-68-7.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.7]) 	by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l08I4CrD004380; 	Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:04:12 GMT
To: dj@redhat.com
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3d55p2y5i.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2

Hi DJ,

  I have applied the patch below on behalf of Kai Tietz.  This was
  part of a larger patch that allows the x86_64 mingw port to use
  either mingw32 or mingw64 as the third part of the triplet:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00235.html

  Am I correct in assuming that your synchronisation scripts will
  bring this change into the sourceware repository, or should I apply
  the patch there as well ?

Cheers
  Nick

ChangeLog
2007-01-08  Kai Tietz	<kai.tietz@onevision.com>

	* configure.in: Add support for an x86_64-mingw* target.

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
--- configure.in	(revision 120570)
+++ configure.in	(working copy)
@@ -278,6 +278,9 @@ case "${host}" in
   i[[3456789]]86-*-go32* | i[[3456789]]86-*-msdosdjgpp*)
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs tcl tk expect dejagnu send-pr uudecode guile itcl gnuserv libffi"
     ;;
+  x86_64-*-mingw*)
+    noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect dejagnu autoconf automake send-pr rcs guile perl texinfo libtool newlib"
+    ;;
   i[[3456789]]86-*-mingw32*)
     # noconfigdirs="tcl tk expect dejagnu make texinfo bison patch flex byacc send-pr uudecode dejagnu diff guile perl itcl gnuserv"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect dejagnu autoconf automake send-pr rcs guile perl texinfo libtool newlib"
@@ -619,6 +622,10 @@ case "${target}" in
     target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-winsup"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect target-libgloss target-newlib ${libgcj}"
     ;;    
+  x86_64-*-mingw*)
+    target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-winsup"
+    noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs expect target-libgloss target-newlib ${libgcj}"
+    ;;    
   *-*-cygwin*)
     target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-libtermcap target-winsup"
     noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-gperf target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
@@ -934,6 +941,8 @@ case "${host}" in
     ;;
   *-mingw32*)
     ;;
+  *-mingw64*)
+    ;;
   *-interix*)
     host_makefile_frag="config/mh-interix"
     ;;