From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1305 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2009 02:26:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 1296 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2009 02:26:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:25:55 +0000 Received: from zps35.corp.google.com (zps35.corp.google.com [172.25.146.35]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n0A2Ppb1028421 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:25:51 GMT Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey3.corp.google.com [192.168.120.116]) by zps35.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n0A2Pnnv001126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:25:49 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (67-218-106-248.cust.layer42.net [67.218.106.248] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0A2PkKB028169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:25:48 -0800 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20090109162543.GZ25055@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor In-Reply-To: <20090109162543.GZ25055@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> (Jakub Jelinek's message of "Fri\, 9 Jan 2009 17\:25\:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 [ I managed to drop gcc-patches when I sent this. ] Jakub Jelinek writes: > [c++] PR c++/36695, P2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00018.html > (with s/default/value/ in the error message) This is OK. > [c/c++] PR c/32455, P2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00644.html I'm not really comfortable with breaking the building of old version of glibc just to fix an ice-on-invalid. I'll approve this for gcc 4.5, to give people more time to update their glibc. > [c++] PR c++/38648, P2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01316.html This is OK. > [c] PR c/32041, P2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00369.html > (with s/32084/32041/g; C++ part already approved by Jason) This is OK if no objections from the C frontend maintainers by Tuesday (or if they approve it before then). Thanks. Ian