From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17393 invoked by alias); 27 May 2011 22:45:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 17384 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2011 22:45:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yosemite.airs.com (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (64.13.131.148) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 22:45:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 1562 invoked by uid 10); 27 May 2011 22:45:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7883 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2011 22:45:11 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Move option-related hooks to common structure References: Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 05:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Joseph S. Myers's message of "Fri, 27 May 2011 16:13:16 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02220.txt.bz2 "Joseph S. Myers" writes: > Ian, what is the right way to handle the gofrontend change in this > patch (to update code for the move of a hook from targetm to > targetm_common)? It's small, mechanical and I think below the > threshold of significance for copyright. I agree, but to avoid any confusion I just moved the code into the gcc-specific area, as is appropriate in any case. Please move your patch from go/gofrontend/export.cc to the identical code at the end of go/go-backend.c. Ian