From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3018 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 16:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2995 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 16:47:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:47:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2RGl7OW003083; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:07 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2RGl6NK017073; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:06 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-248-158.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.158]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2RGl6sO015274; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:06 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3EDB3C88205; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:50:54 -0600 (MDT) To: "Richard Guenther" Cc: "Andreas Tobler" , "Ralf Wildenhues" , "Gcc Patch List" Subject: Re: Patch: automatic dependencies for gcc References: <20080325202425.GD18200@ins.uni-bonn.de> <47E9687C.8000001@fgznet.ch> <84fc9c000803260601r44ed69ecn3eb0b690ad358ae@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803270353u1a2ddec8pf4edf2ecee753822@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803270943j3ded7c7bq71ea706167005c8b@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000803270943j3ded7c7bq71ea706167005c8b@mail.gmail.com> (Richard Guenther's message of "Thu\, 27 Mar 2008 17\:43\:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg01701.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Guenther writes: >> I'll prepare a patch to revert this change. Let me know what you think. Richard> Well, as this only affects re-builds (?) in gcc/ it isn't Richard> fatal (I just hit Ctrl-C and make again, that makes it work). That seems very unsatisfying to me, especially because I can easily reproduce the problem with 'make -j2 all'. I think unpredictable hangs are much worse than manually maintaining dependencies. We can always try again in a couple years, after a new make is released. I'm bootstrapping the reversion on a couple machines now. I will send it before the end of the day. Tom