From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4819 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2007 18:12:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 4800 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2007 18:12:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:12:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BICQki013148; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:12:26 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BICPjU003018; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:12:25 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6BICNk6022652; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:12:24 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 23440379892; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:55:22 -0600 (MDT) To: David Daney Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@nildram.co.uk Subject: Re: [Patch] 3/3 FFI: Use __builtin_flush_icache() to flush MIPS i-cache. References: <468734D3.3020908@avtrex.com> <4687370E.7090801@avtrex.com> <468CA0EA.5010905@avtrex.com> <87k5te3cmn.fsf@firetop.home> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87k5te3cmn.fsf@firetop.home> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Thu\, 05 Jul 2007 19\:54\:08 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg01078.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Sandiford writes: Richard> David Daney writes: >> A new version of the patch. All that changed is the name of the >> builtin. It is now __builtin___clear_cache(). Richard> Assuming this is considered part of the MIPS target... Yes, target maintainers can approve patches to the corresponding libffi port. Tom